UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

 

☒ 

Filed by the Registrant

☐ 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ 

Definitive Additional Materials

☐ 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to 167; 240.14a-12under §240.14a-12

 

Ampco–Pittsburgh Corporation

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒ 

No fee required.

 

☐ 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐ 

Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and 0-11.

 


(1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5) 

Total fee paid:

☐ 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐ 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

(2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3) 

Filing Party:

(4) 

Date Filed:


726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301 Carnegie, Pennsylvania 15106

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD THURSDAY, MAY 9, 20195, 2022

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

 

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (“Ampco” or the “Corporation”) will be held invirtually. You will be able to attend the Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor,meeting virtually, vote your shares virtually, vote your shares electronically, and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AP2022 and following the instructions on your proxy card. The Duquesne Club, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,meeting starts at 10:00 A.M. on Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 10:00 AM, Eastern Time,5, 2022 for the following purposes:

 

1.

to elect a class of twofour directors for a term that expires in 2022;2025;

 

2.

to consider andhold a non-binding advisory vote on an amendment to approve the compensation of our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares;named executive officers;

 

3.

to hold an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation;

4.

to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & ToucheBDO USA, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2022; and

 

5.4.

to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

ShareholdersThe foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice of Annual Meeting. The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the four nominees for director named in the accompanying Proxy Statement and a vote “FOR” each of Proposal 2 and 3 on the enclosed proxy card.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 12, 2019,9, 2022 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Annual Meeting may be adjourned or postponed from time to time. At any adjourned or postponed meeting, action with respect to matters specified in this notice may be taken without further notice to shareholders, unless required by law or the Corporation’s Bylaws, as amended (the “Bylaws”).

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend, we encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as possible using one of three convenient methods by (i) accessing the Internet site described on the proxy card or voting instruction form provided to you, (ii) calling the toll-free number on the proxy card or voting instruction form provided to you, or (iii) completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card promptly in the accompanying envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States, or voting instruction form provided to you. You are urged to complete and submit the enclosed proxy card, no matter the size of your shareholdings.

If your broker, bank, trustee or other similar organization is the holder of record of your shares (i.e., your shares are held in “street name”), you will receive a voting instruction form from the holder of record. You must provide voting instructions by filling out the voting instruction form in order for your shares to be voted. We recommend that you instruct your broker or other nominee to vote your shares on the enclosed proxy card. The proxy is revocable and will not affect your right to vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting.


The Board, including all of its independent directors, strongly and unanimously recommends that you vote on the Proxy Card or voting instruction form “FOR” the election of Mr. Robert A. DeMichiei, Ms. Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Mr. William K. Lieberman, and Dr. Laurence E. Paul.

If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting, a replay of the meeting will be available on www.ampcopittsburgh.com/investors.

Regardless of the number of shares of Common Stock of the Corporation that you own, your vote is important. Thank you for your continued support, interest and investment in Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

 

Maria V. Trainor,

 

Vice President, GeneralMelanie L. Sprowson,

Counsel andCorporate Secretary

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

March ___, 201925, 2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on May 9, 20195, 2022

The proxy statement and the annual report of the Corporation are available at


http://www.ampcopittsburgh.com/investors.html.investors

For those requesting physical copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021, please mail such request to:

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

c/o Corporate Secretary

726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301

P.O. Box 457

Carnegie, PA 15106

 

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person.virtually. Your vote is important, and,

whether or not you expect to attend in person,virtually, it is requested that you PROMPTLY fill in, sign, and return the

enclosed proxy card or follow the internet or telephone voting instructions included on the proxy card.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Statement

1

Proxy Summary

1

Questions andAnd Answers Regarding theThe Annual Meeting

5

Solicitation of Proxies

7

Voting Securities and Record Date

8

Required Vote

8

Election ofOf Directors (Proposal 1)

9

13

Nominee for Directors for a Term of Office Expiring in 2022Summary Of Director Attributes And Skills

9

14

Board Of Directors’ Nominees

15

Nominees For Director Whose Term Of Office Expires In 2025

15

Continuing Directors Whose Term ofOf Office Expires In 20212024

9

16

Continuing Directors Whose Term ofOf Office Expires In 20202023

10

18

Process Of Evaluation Of Director Candidates

20

Director Compensation

20

Director Fees

20

2021 Director Compensation

21

Directors’ Alignment With Shareholders; Stock Ownership Guidelines

21

Prohibitions Against Short Sales, Hedging, Margin Accounts And Pledging

22

Corporate Governance

11

23

Corporate Governance Summary

11

23

Board Independence

12

24

Leadership Structure

12

24

Director Nominating Procedures

12

Non-Management Directors

13

Shareholder Communications with Directors

13

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

1325

Director Terms

14

25

Voting For Directors

26

Board’s Role In Risk Oversight

26

Executive Sessions

26

Security Holder Communications With Directors

26

Annual Meeting Attendance

14

26

Board Committees; Director Compensation; Stock Ownership GuidelinesCommittees

15

27

Summary

15

27

Audit Committee

15

27

Compensation Committee

16

28

Executive Committee

16

28

Finance And Investment Committee

28

Nominating and CorporateAnd Governance Committee

16

Director Compensation

16

Stock Ownership Guidelines

1728

Security Ownership ofOf Certain Beneficial Owners andAnd Management

18

29

Beneficial Ownership ofOf More Than Five Percent

18

29

Director andAnd Executive Officer Stock Ownership

19

30

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

19

Proposal to AmendNon-Binding, Advisory Vote On Compensation Of Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Authorized Shares of the Corporation’s Common StockNamed Executive Officers (Proposal 2)

21

31

Effect of Increase in Authorized SharesCompensation Discussion And Analysis (“CD&A”)

21

Purposes of The Articles Amendment Proposal

21

Potential Risks Associated with The Amendment

22

Vote Required

22

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Proposal 3)

2333

Executive Compensation Overview

24

33

Compensation Overview2021 Highlights

24

33

Key Features Of Our Executive Compensation Program

34

2021 Compensation Objectives

36

2021 Compensation Decisions

37

Executive Officer Retirements In 2021

42

Other Compensation Practices And Policies

43

Summary Compensation Table

34

45

Outstanding Equity Awards atAt Fiscal Year-End

35

46

Retirement Benefits

37

49

Potential Payments Upon Termination, Resignation orOr Change inIn Control

38

50

Report Of The Compensation Committee

51

Certain Relationships andAnd Related Transactions

40

52

Report ofOf The Audit Committee

40

52

Ratification of theOf The Appointment of Deloitte & ToucheOf BDO USA, LLP as theAs The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019For 2022 (Proposal 4)3)

42

54


 

 


 

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

March 29, 2019

Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 9, 20195, 2022

 

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card, along with the 2021 Annual Report to Shareholders (including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021) is being made available to shareholders on or about March 25, 2022 in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Corporation”) of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held virtually on May 5, 2022 at 10:00 A.M., Eastern Time, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AP2022, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. Any shareholder giving such a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by written notice to the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106, by giving a later dated proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in itself have the effect of revoking the proxy.

As used in this Proxy Statement, the terms “Ampco”, “the Corporation”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation.

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. You should read thethis entire proxy statementProxy Statement carefully before voting. This proxy statementProxy Statement and the related proxy materials were first mailed to shareholders and made available on the internet on or about March ___, 2019.25, 2022.

 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

  

 

 

•     Time and Date:

 

10:00 AM,A.M., Eastern Time, May 9, 20195, 2022

 

 

•     Place:

 

The Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor

The Duquesne Club

325 Sixth Avenue

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Virtually via:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AP2022

 

 

•    Record DateDate:

  

March 12, 20199, 2022

 

 

1


•    Voting

  

Only shareholders as of the record date, March 12, 2019,9, 2022, are entitled to vote. As of the Record Date for the annual meeting, there were 19,190,536 shares of Common Stock outstanding and expected to be entitled to vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting. There are no other securities of the Corporation outstanding and entitled to vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting. Holders of warrants exercisable for shares of Common Stock that have not been exercised prior to the Record Date will not be entitled to vote the shares underlying such warrants at the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Your broker will NOT be able to vote your shares with respect to any of the matters presented at the meeting other than the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm unless you give your broker specific voting instructions.

Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person,virtually, please cast your vote as soon as possible by:

•     Using the Internet at www.proxyvote.com;

•     Calling toll-free from the United States, U.S. territories and Canada to 1-800-690-6903; or

•     Mailing your signed proxy card or voting instruction form.

 

 


2


•    Attending the Annual Meeting

  

To be admitted in person,to the virtual Annual Meeting, you will be requiredneed the control number provided to present a government-issued photo identification (such as a driver’s license or passport).

If you hold shares in street name, you must request a confirmation of beneficial ownership fromwith your broker to vote in person at the meeting.proxy voting materials.

You do not need to attend the annual meetingAnnual Meeting to vote if you have properly submitted your proxy in advance of the meeting.

 

 

 

1


•    Meeting Agenda

 

1.   Election of twofour directors;

2.     Consideration of and voting on an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares;

3.   Non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive compensation;officers;

4.3.   Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & ToucheBDO USA, LLPas our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2022; and

5.4.   Transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

 

 

Cooperation Agreement

On February 10, 2022, the Corporation entered into a Cooperation Agreement (the “Cooperation Agreement”) with Ancora Merlin, LP, Ancora Merlin Institutional, LP, Ancora Catalyst, LP, Ancora Catalyst Institutional, LP, Ancora Alternatives LLC, Ancora Holdings Group, LLC and Fredrick DiSanto (collectively, the “Ancora Parties”), pursuant to which the Corporation (i) increased the size of the board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board”) to eleven directors, (ii) appointed to the Board, Fredrick DiSanto and Darrell L. McNair (together with Mr. DiSanto, the “Ancora Appointees”) to serve as directors of the Corporation as members of the class of directors having a term expiring at the 2023 annual meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders (the “2023 Annual Meeting”), and (iii) appointed to the Board, Laurence E. Paul (Dr. Paul, collectively with the Ancora Appointees, the “New Independent Directors”) and appointed current director, William K. Lieberman, each to serve as directors of the Corporation as members of the class of directors having a term expiring at the 2022 Annual Meeting. Such appointments were effective immediately upon execution of the Cooperation Agreement.

Prior to the expiration of the Standstill Period (as defined below), the Board of Directors and all applicable committees of the Board of Directors will not increase the size of the Board of Directors above eleven directors without the prior written consent of the Ancora Parties. In the event that the Ancora Parties cease to beneficially own at least 4% of the Corporation’s then issued and outstanding common stock (the “Four Percent Threshold”), Mr. DiSanto shall resign from the Board of Directors and all applicable committees. In addition, if, during the Standstill Period, any Ancora Appointee resigns from the Board of Directors or is unable (due to death or disability) or refuses to serve on the Board of Directors, so long as the Ancora Parties at that time and at all times since the date of the Cooperation Agreement satisfy the Four Percent Threshold, then the Ancora Parties will work to identify a replacement that is reasonably acceptable to the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors for appointment to the Board of Directors on the terms set forth in the Cooperation Agreement.

The Corporation has also agreed to consider each Ancora Appointee for membership on one or more committees of the Board of Directors in the same manner as other independent members of the Board of Directors and also form a Business Improvement Advisory Committee within 120 days to support and make recommendations to the Board of Directors and support management’s review of business improvements and enhancements for the Corporation.

Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, the Ancora Parties have agreed not to make director nominations to the Corporation and support the Board’s full slate of directors at the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders.

During the Standstill Period, the Ancora Parties have agreed to vote all of their shares of common stock of the Corporation in favor of recommendations of the Board with respect to (i) the election, removal and/or replacement of directors (a “Director Proposal”), (ii) the ratification of the appointment of the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm and (iii) any other proposal submitted to the Corporation’s shareholders at a meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders, in each case as such recommendation of the Board is set forth in the applicable definitive proxy statement filed in respect thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event both Institutional Shareholder

3


Services Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., LLC (“Glass Lewis”) make a recommendation that differs from the recommendation of the Board with respect to any proposal submitted to the shareholders at any meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders (other than Director Proposals), the Ancora Parties are permitted to vote in accordance with the ISS and Glass Lewis recommendation. The Ancora Parties are also entitled to vote in their sole discretion with respect to any publicly announced proposal relating to a merger, acquisition, disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries or other business combination involving the Corporation, in each case, that requires a vote of the Corporation’s shareholders.

Ampco-Pittsburgh is not required to include any Ancora Appointee (or any replacement thereof) or any of the other New Independent Directors on its slate of director nominees at any annual meeting following the 2022 Annual Meeting.

The Cooperation Agreement also includes customary standstill, non-disparagement and expense reimbursement provisions. The standstill restrictions on the Ancora Parties began on the date of the Cooperation Agreement and remain in effect until the earlier of (i) the date that is 30 days prior to the deadline for the submission of shareholder nominations for the 2023 Annual Meeting (ii) the date that is 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the 2022 Annual Meeting (such period, the “Standstill Period”).

The Cooperation Agreement will terminate upon the expiration of the last day of the Standstill Period, unless earlier terminated by mutual written agreement of Ampco-Pittsburgh and the Ancora Parties.

While any Ancora Appointee serves on the Board, such Ancora Appointee will receive compensation on the same basis as all other non-employee directors of the Corporation.

Voting Matters

Proposals

 

Board Recommendation

Election of Directors

 

FOR each nominee named in this proxy statement

Amendment of the AmendedBoard's nominees: Mr. Robert A. DeMichiei, Ms. Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Mr. William K. Lieberman and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares

FORDr. Laurence E. Paul

Non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive compensationofficers

 

FOR

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & ToucheBDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20192022

 

FOR

 

Board Nominees

You are being asked to vote on the election of nominees to serve on the Board, for a term of three years to fill the class of directors whose term expires in 2025.  Additional information about the background and experience of the four nominees recommended by the Board can be found beginning on page 14.

Name

 

Age

 

 

Director

Since

 

Occupation

 

Experience/

Qualification

 

Independent

 

Committee

Assignments

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

63

 

 

2017

 

Principal of Fessenden Associates

 

Extensive operations experience in the metals industry; many years of service as a director of companies; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Compensation

Terry L. Dunlap

 

59

 

 

Nominated in 2019

 

Principal of Sweetwater LLC

 

Extensive operations experience in the metals industry; board service; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Pending election, nominated to Compensation Committee

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE BOARD’S NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1 USING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.

 

Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019

We are requesting that shareholders ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. The table below shows the fees paid by the Corporation to Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2018.

 

 

2018

 

Audit fees(a)

 

$

1,656,185

 

Audit-related fees(b)

 

$

2,028

 

Tax fees(c)

 

$

1,964

 

All other fees

 

 

 

Total

 

$

1,660,177

 

2

4


 

 

Name

 

Age

 

 

Director

Since

 

Occupation

 

Experience/

Qualification

 

Independent

 

Committee

Assignments

Robert A. DeMichiei

 

 

57

 

 

Nominee

 

Board Director and Strategic Advisor

 

Diverse operational background and experience leading companies through growth and complex change; board service

 

X

 

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

66

 

 

2017

 

Principal of Fessenden Associates

 

Extensive operations experience in the metals industry; many years of service as a director of companies; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Executive; Compensation (Chair); Finance and Investment

William K. Lieberman

 

 

76

 

 

2004

 

President of The Lieberman Companies

 

Extensive management experience in the insurance, benefit and risk management areas; board service; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Executive; Compensation; Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Laurence E. Paul

 

57

 

 

 

 

Managing Principal of Laurel Crown Partners

 

Leadership in international organizations; experienced in financial management, risk assessment, and strategy

 

X

 

 

Corporate Governance Highlights (Page 23)

We are committed to good corporate governance, which we believe is important to the success of our business and in advancing shareholder interests.  Our corporate governance practices are described in greater detail in the “Corporate Governance” section.  Highlights include:

(a)

Fees for audit services primarily related to the audit

Ten out of (1) the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting and (2) statutory filings for the Corporation’s foreign subsidiaries.eleven Board members are independent

(b)

Fees for audit-related services primarily related to the subscription fee for Deloitte’s Authoritative Guidance.

Separate non-executive Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer roles

(c)

Fees

Independent Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance, and Finance and Investment Committees

Risk oversight by full Board and committees

Regular executive sessions of independent directors

Average Board attendance of 100% during 2021

Nominating and Governance Committee considers director candidates recommended by shareholders on the same basis as internally nominated candidates

Cumulative voting for directors

Regular Board and committee self-evaluations

“Say-on-Pay” votes to be held annually

Policies (i) prohibiting hedging and pledging, (ii) providing for clawbacks in connection with short and long-term incentive plans, (iii) generally prohibiting tax services in 2018 related to general tax consultation.gross-ups of perquisites, and (iv) for protection of whistleblowers

Executive Compensation Program Highlights

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain top talent by enabling the Corporation to compete effectively for the highest quality personnel and to pay for performance by aligning compensation with the achievement of both short-term and long-term financial objectives that build shareholder value.

The 20182021 executive compensation program featuresfeatured a balanced mix of salary and performance-driven annual and long-term incentive award opportunities. In designing our executive compensation program, we have

5


implemented programs and policies that support our commitment to good compensation governance and that create alignment between our executives and our shareholders, as highlighted below:shareholders.

The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. Each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” of the Corporation, as defined under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and an “outside director” for purposes of the corporate compensation provisions contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategies, including a review of our compensation-related risk profile to ensure that our compensation-related risks are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

In 2018, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent provider of compensation consulting services for decisions relating to compensation. Pay Governance was retained to identify a reasonable group of companies as a peer group to benchmark executive compensation levels and incentive plan design and to assist the Compensation Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities and duties.

A significant portion of each executive’s annual pay is based on objective performance metrics and, therefore, “at-risk” based on corporate performance. In addition, the equity-based portion of our executive compensation program is designed to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities. The same peer group is used to determine our relative performance for vesting of a portion of performance share unit awards.

The equity awards granted to our executive officers vest over multi-year periods, consistent with current practice and our retention objectives.

We have a clawback policy applicable to executive officers pursuant to which, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any period (the “Restatement Period”) in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Compensation Committee has the right during the three-year period following the Restatement Period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment executives will be required to make.

We do not provide any Internal Revenue Code Section 280G excise tax gross-up rights or any other significant tax gross-up rights to our executive officers.

The compensation arrangements with our executive officers contain double-trigger equity acceleration provisions in the event of a change in control.

3

6


 

WHAT WE DO

Align CEO pay with corporate performance

Use long-term incentives to link a significant portion of Named Executive Officer pay to corporate performance

Balance short-term and long-term incentives

Cap incentive awards

Authorize the Board to claw back executive compensation

Use an independent compensation consultant

Compare to peer group to ensure competitive compensation opportunities

Multi-year vesting periods for equity awards

Significant portion of compensation “at risk” subject to achievement of performance metrics

Maintain robust stock ownership guidelines

Provide double trigger equity vesting in the event of a change in control

Review tally sheets for all Executive Officers

Review of our compensation-related risk profile

WHAT WE DON’T DO

 

X

We have a policy prohibiting “underwater” options from being repricedSection 280G tax gross-up rights

X

Option repricing or replaced (either with new optionsreplacement without   shareholder approval

X

Allow hedging or other equity awards), unless approved bypledging of our shareholders.securities

X

Provide significant perquisites

Additional information about our compensation philosophy and program, including compensation determinations for each of our named executive officers, can be found in the “Compensation“Executive Compensation Overview” starting on page 24 in33 of this Proxy Statement.

Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022

We are requesting that shareholders ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. The table below shows the fees paid by the Corporation to BDO USA, LLP, the independent public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

 

 

2021

 

Audit fees(a)

 

$

546,612

 

Audit-related fees(b)

 

 

8,144

 

Tax fees

 

 

 

All other fees

 

 

 

Total

 

$

554,756

 

(a)

Fees for audit services primarily related to the audit of (1) the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements and (2) statutory financial statements for the Corporation’s foreign subsidiaries.

(b)

Fees for audit-related services related to attest services not required by statute or regulation for 2021.

We encourage you to read the entire proxy statementProxy Statement and to vote your shares atusing the instructions on the proxy card for the Annual Meeting. If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person,virtually, we encourage you to submit a proxy using the instructions on the proxy card so that your shares will be represented and voted.voted for each of the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

 

7



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDINGREGARDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

Q: How do I attend the virtual meeting?

A: You will be able to attend the meeting virtually, vote your shares electronically, and submit your questions during the question and answer portion of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AP2022 and following the instructions on the proxy card. The meeting starts at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Time on May 5, 2022. To be admitted to the virtual meeting you will need the control number provided to you with your proxy voting materials.

Q: Why am I receiving these materials?

A: As a shareholder, we are providing these proxy materials to you in connection with our solicitation of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will take place on May 9, 2019.5, 2022. These materials were first mailed to shareholders on or about March 29, 2019.25, 2022. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting, and you are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Q: What is included in these materials?

A: These materials include:

Our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting;

The proxy card/voting instruction form for the Annual Meeting; and

Our 20182021 Annual Report to Shareholders,on Form 10-K, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements.

These materials also include the proxy/voting instruction card for the Annual Meeting.

Q: What am I being asked to vote on?

A: You are being asked to vote on the following proposals:

Proposal 1 —Election of two directors;four directors for a term that expires in 2025;

Proposal 2 — Consideration and—Non-binding, advisory vote on an amendment to approve the Amended and Restated Articlescompensation of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 sharesour named executive officers (the “Articles Amendment“Say-on-Pay Proposal”);

Proposal 3Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (the “Say-on-Pay Proposal”);

Proposal 4Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & ToucheBDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20192022 (the “Deloitte“BDO Ratification Proposal”); and

Such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Q: Why is the Board making such recommendations?

A: We describe each proposal and the Board’s reason for its recommendation with respect to each proposal beginning on pages 13, 32, and 54, and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Q: What are the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors?

A: The Board recommends the following votes:

FOR the election of Mr. Robert A. DeMichiei, Ms. Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Mr. William K. Lieberman, and Dr. Laurence E. Paul for the two director nominees namedterm that expires in this proxy statement;2025;

FOR the Articles AmendmentSay-on-Pay Proposal;

FOR the Say-on-Pay Proposal; and

FOR the DeloitteBDO Ratification Proposal.

Q: Will any other matters be voted on?

A: We are not aware of any other matters that will be brought before the shareholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting, your proxy card will authorize each of Michael G. McAuleyKeith A. Zatawski and Maria TrainorMelanie L. Sprowson (together, the “Proxies”) to vote on such matters in their discretion.

8


Q: Who is soliciting my proxy?

A: The Board, on behalf of the Corporation, is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of Common Stock on all matters scheduled to come before the Annual Meeting, whether or not you attend the meeting. By completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card or voting instruction form, or by transmitting your proxy and voting instructions over the Internet or by telephone, you are authorizing the Proxies to vote your shares of Common Stock at the Annual Meeting as you have instructed. Proxies will be solicited on behalf of the Board by the Corporation’s directors, director nominees, and certain executive officers of the Corporation.

Q: Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

A: The Board has set March 9, 2022 as the Record Date for the Annual Meeting. You are entitled to notice and to vote if you are a shareholder as of the close of business on March 9, 2022. You are entitled to one vote on each proposal for each share of Common Stock you hold on the Record Date, except shareholders have the right to cumulate votes in regard to the election of directors. Your shares may be voted at the Annual Meeting only if you are “present” at the Annual Meeting or your shares are represented by a valid proxy. At the close of business on March 9, 2022, there were 19,190,536 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding.

Q: What is the difference between a shareholder of “record” and a “street name” owner?

A: If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. The Corporation sent the proxy materials directly to you. The proxy card accompanying this Proxy Statement will provide information regarding how to vote your shares.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. You are considered to be the beneficial owner of those shares and your shares are said to be held in “street name,” and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. Street name owners generally cannot submit a proxy or vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares. If you do not provide that organization specific direction on how to vote, other than with respect to the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm, your shares held in the name of that organization may not be voted and will not be considered entitled to vote on any matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting, and as such, however, your shares will be considered present at the Annual Meeting. If you own your shares in “street name,” please instruct your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares using the voting instruction form provided by your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee so that your vote can be counted. The voting instruction form provided by your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee may also include information about how to submit your voting instructions over the Internet or by telephone, if such options are available.

Q: How do I cast my vote?

A: If you are a shareholder of record,The process for voting your shares depends on how your Common Stock is held. Generally, you may casthold Common Stock in your vote using anyname as a “shareholder of the following methods:record” or in an account with a broker, bank, trust or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”).

ViaIf your shares are registered in your name, you may vote your shares at the Internet,Annual Meeting or by visitingproxy whether or not you attend the website “www.proxyvote.com” and following the instructions for Internet voting on your proxy/voting instruction card;


By dialing 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions for telephone voting on your proxy/voting instruction card;Annual Meeting.

By completing and mailing your proxy/voting instruction card; or

By casting your vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If you vote over the Internet, you may incur related ancillary costs, such as telephone and Internet access charges, for which you will be responsible. The telephone and Internet voting facilities for the shareholders of record of all shares will close at 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 8, 2019. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders by use of a control number and to allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

If you vote by Internet or telephone or return your signed proxy/voting instruction card, your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you do not indicate how your shares are to be voted on a proposal, your shares will be voted, with respect to that proposal, in accordance with the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account in your broker’s name (also known as “street name”), you should follow the instructions for voting provided by your broker or nominee. You may submit voting instructions by Internet or telephone, or you may complete and mail a voting instruction card to your broker or nominee. If you provide specific voting instructions by telephone, Internet or mail, your broker or nominee will vote your shares as you have directed.

VOTING METHODS

Ballots will be providedIf you are a shareholder of record as of the close of business on the Record Date, you may cast your vote using any of the following methods:

Vote via the Internet, by visiting the website “www.proxyvote.com.” Follow the instructions on your proxy card to transmit your voting instructions over the Internet and for electronic delivery of information.  Have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand when you access the website and follow the

9


instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.  Shareholders who submit a proxy by Internet need not also return a proxy card or the voting instruction form forwarded by your broker, bank, trust or other holder of record by mail.

Vote by Phone by dialing 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions for telephone voting on your proxy card or voting instruction form to transmit your voting instructions.  Have the proxy card or voting instruction form in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.  Shareholders who submit a proxy by telephone need not return a proxy card or the voting instruction form forwarded by your broker, bank, trust or other holder of record by mail.

Vote by mail by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided.  If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held in street name, please return a properly signed and dated voting instruction form by following the instructions specified in the form.

Vote “In Person” at the Virtual Annual Meeting, by casting your vote electronically during the Annual Meeting to anyone who wants to votebeing held virtually via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AP2022. Shares held in personyour name as the shareholder of record may be voted “in person” at the meeting. If you hold sharesAnnual Meeting. Shares held beneficially in street name may be voted “in person” only if you must requestobtain a confirmationlegal proxy from the broker, bank, trust or other nominee that holds your shares as of the Record Date, indicating that you were a beneficial ownership fromowner of shares as of the close of business on such date and the number of shares that you beneficially owned at that time.  Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your brokerproxy or voting instructions by Internet, telephone, or mail so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

If you vote over the Internet, you may incur related ancillary costs, such as telephone and Internet access charges, for which you will be responsible. The telephone and Internet voting facilities for the shareholders of record of all shares will close at 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 4, 2022. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders by use of a control number and to allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

You will be able to vote your shares electronically during the Annual Meeting if you attend virtually.

If you vote by Internet or telephone or return your signed proxy card or voting instruction form, your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you do not indicate how your shares are to be voted on a proposal, your shares will be voted, with respect to that proposal, in person ataccordance with the meeting.voting recommendations of the Board of Directors.

Q: Can I revoke or change my vote?vote after I deliver my proxy?

A: Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof at the Annual Meeting by:

Submitting a valid, later-dated proxy/proxy card or voting instruction card;form;

Submitting a valid, subsequent vote by telephone or the Internet at any time prior to 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 8, 2019;4, 2022;

Notifying our Corporate Secretary in writing that you have revoked your proxy; or

Completing a written ballotVoting electronically at the virtual Annual Meeting (your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in and of itself, revoke your prior proxy).

If your shares are held in a brokerage account in your broker’s name, you should follow the instructions for changing or revoking your vote provided by your broker or nominee. Such shareholders may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting if they obtain a legal proxy from their broker, bank, trust or other nominee which holds their shares in street name.

10


Q: Is cumulative voting permitted for the election of directors?

A: You have the right to cumulate your votes by distributing a number of votes, determined by multiplying the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting (i.e., four) by the number of your shares as of the close of business on the Record Date, to one individual nominee or among two or more nominees. Unless contrary instructions are provided on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form, the persons named as proxies may cast all of their votes “For” or “Withhold” with respect to the nominees or may allocate the votes among the nominees in accordance with their discretion.

Q: What will happenhappens if I do not instructspecify how I want my shares voted? What is discretionary voting? What is a broker how to vote?non-vote?

A: IfAs a shareholder as of the close of business on the Record Date, if you properly complete, sign, date and return a proxy card or voting instruction form, your shares of Common Stock will be voted as you specify. However, if you are helda shareholder of record and you return an executed proxy card or submit your proxy by telephone or Internet and do not specify how you want your shares voted, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares:

FOR the election of Mr. Robert A. DeMichiei, Ms. Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Mr. William K. Lieberman, and Dr. Laurence E. Paul to serve as directors for a term that expires in 2025;

FOR the Say-on-Pay Proposal; and

FOR the BDO Ratification Proposal.

A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker holding shares for a beneficial owner has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares. If you own your shares beneficially in street name through a broker and you do not instructprovide voting instructions to your broker, how to vote, one of two things can happen depending on the type of proposal. Pursuant to New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, brokers have discretionary power to vote your shares will be considered to be broker non-votes and will not be voted on “routine” matters, but they doany proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary powerauthority to vote your shares on “non-routine” matters. We believe that the only proposal that will be considered routine under NYSE rules is the Deloitte Ratification Proposal, which means that your broker may vote your shares in its discretion on that proposal. This is known as “broker discretionary voting.”vote.

The election of directors, the Articles Amendment Proposal and the Say-on-Pay Proposal are considered non-routine matters. Accordingly, your broker may not vote your shares with respect to these matters if you have not provided instructions. This is called a “broker non-vote.”

We strongly encourage you to submit your proxy and exercise your right to vote as a shareholder.


Q: How many shares must be present to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?

A: Holders of at least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast at the Annual Meeting must be represented in person or by proxyvirtually at the Annual Meeting in order to conduct business. This is called a quorum. If you vote, your shares will be part of the quorum. Abstentions, “Withheld”withheld votes, and broker non-votes alsobroker-non-votes will be counted in determining whether a quorum exists.

The judge of election will determine whether a quorum is present. At the close of business on March 9, 2022, there were 19,190,536 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding. Shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if:

you attend the Annual Meeting; or

your shares are represented by a properly authorized and submitted proxy (submitted over the Internet, by telephone or by mail).

If you are a record holder and you submit your proxy, regardless of whether you abstain from voting on one or more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. If your shares are held in “street name,” your shares are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum if you provide voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee and such broker, bank, trustee or other nominee submits a proxy covering your shares. In the absence of a quorum, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned, from time to time, by vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented at such meeting (but no other business shall be transacted at such meeting), without any notice if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken unless the adjournment is for more than thirty days, or unless after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, in which event a notice of the adjourned meeting will be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at the adjourned meeting.

Q: What is the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes on voting?

A: Abstentions will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. Because each director nominee will require more “FOR” votes than the director nominees who receive the least number of votes in order to be elected, “withhold” votes have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1. To approve the Say-on-

11


Pay Proposal and BDO Ratification Proposal, if a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by all shareholders entitled to vote on a particular matter is required for approval. As a result, abstention votes will have no effect on the outcome of the Say-on-Pay Proposal and BDO Ratification Proposal.

A broker non-vote occurs when the broker is unable to vote on a proposal because the proposal is not routine and the shareholder who owns the shares in “street name” has not provided any voting instructions to the broker on that matter. The rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) apply to brokers that are NYSE members voting on matters being submitted to shareholders at the Annual Meeting. Under the rules of the NYSE, if a proposal is routine, a broker holding shares for an owner in street name may vote on the proposal without voting instructions. As a result, other than with respect to BDO Ratification Proposal, brokers are not entitled to vote on any of the proposals at the Annual Meeting without receiving voting instructions from the beneficial owners, and thus the underlying shares will not be counted for establishing the presence of a quorum, and will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals 1 or 2. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker holding shares of Common Stock for you, your shares will not be voted with respect to any proposal. We therefore encourage you to provide voting instructions on a proxy card or the voting instruction form provided by the broker that holds your shares, in each case by carefully following the instructions provided.

Q: What vote is required to approve the proposals?

A: InELECTION OF DIRECTORS:  Pursuant to our Bylaws, if a quorum is present at the electionAnnual Meeting, with respect to Proposal 1 – “Election of Directors”, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. “Plurality” means that the four nominees who receive the mostlargest number of “FOR” votes of the shares entitled to be voted in the election for the available positionsdirectors will be elected. Ifelected, whether or not they received a majority of votes cast. You may vote “FOR” all Board nominees, “WITHHOLD” your vote as to all Board nominees, or “FOR ALL” Board nominees except the specific nominee from whom you “WITHHOLD” your vote. There is no “against” option. Shares voting “withhold” are counted for purposes of determining a quorum. However, if you withhold authority to vote for a particular nominee, your vote will not count either “FOR” or “AGAINST” the nominee. Abstentions are not counted inwith respect to the election of directors, and neither abstentions nor broker non-votesany or all of the nominees, your shares will not be voted with respect to those nominees indicated. Therefore, “withhold” votes will not affect the outcome.

Since all membersoutcome of the Boardelection of Directorsdirectors. Brokers do not have voted “FOR”discretionary authority to vote on the Articles Amendmentelection of directors. Broker non-votes and “withhold votes” will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1.

Say-on-Pay Proposal: The approval of a non-binding, advisory resolution approving the approvalcompensation of our named executive officers requires the affirmative vote by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal.  Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Articles Amendment Proposal.

The Say-on-Pay Proposal and the Deloitte Ratification Proposal will require approval by the majority of the votes cast by all shareholders entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting assumingwhen a quorum is present. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” If you “ABSTAIN” from voting on Proposal 2, the presenceabstention will have no effect on the outcome of a quorum. Neither abstentions nor brokerthe Say-on-Pay Proposal. While the vote on Proposal 2 is advisory and will not be binding on us or the Board, the Board will review the results of the voting on this proposal and take it into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation as we have done in this and previous years. Broker non-votes will have anyno effect on these proposals.the outcome of Proposal 2.

BDO Ratification Proposal: The ratification of the appointment of BDO requires the affirmative vote by the holders of a majority of the votes cast by all shareholders entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting when a quorum is present. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” If you “ABSTAIN” from voting on Proposal 3, the abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the BDO ratification proposal. Broker non-votes will also have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 3.

Votes will be tabulated by an inspectora judge of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.

Q: What does it mean if I receive moreCould other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

A: We do not expect any other items of business will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than one notice orthose described in this Proxy Statement. However, by completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card or submitting your proxy or voting instruction form?instructions over the Internet or by telephone, you will give to the persons named as proxies discretionary voting authority with respect to any matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, and of which we did not have notice at least by February 11, 2022, which is 90 days before the anniversary date of our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and such persons named as proxies intend to vote on any such other matter in accordance with their best judgment.

12


Q: Who will count the votes?

A: It means yourAll votes will be tabulated as required by Pennsylvania law, the state of our incorporation, by the independent judge of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes. Shares held by persons attending the Annual Meeting but not voting and shares are registered differentlyrepresented by proxies that reflect abstentions as to one or are held in more than one account at the transfer agent and/or with banks or brokers. Please vote allproposals will be counted as present for purposes of your shares.determining a quorum. Broker non-votes will not be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum.

Q: What do I need to do to attend the Annual Meeting?

A: Valid government-issued photo identification, suchAdmission to the Annual Meeting is limited to shareholders and their duly appointed proxy holders as of the close of business on the Record Date with proof of ownership of Common Stock. In order to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you will need the control number provided to you with your proxy voting materials. The virtual meeting will begin at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Time at the following link: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AP2022.

If you wish to vote the shares you own beneficially during the meeting, you must first obtain a driver’s license“legal proxy” from your broker or passport, is requiredcustodian. If you choose not to provide instructions or a legal proxy, your shares are referred to as “uninstructed shares.” Your broker or custodian will not have the discretion to vote these shares on your behalf at the Annual Meeting.

You are encouraged to vote using the instructions on the proxy card to have your shares voted regardless of whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. The registration desk will open at 9:45 a.m. andYour vote is very important. Please vote using the meeting will begin at 10:00 AM. Please note that seating ininstructions on the meeting room is limited.

Ifproxy card even if you own shares in street name, you will needplan to ask your bank or broker for an admission card in the form of a confirmation of beneficial ownership. You will need to bring a confirmation of beneficial ownership with you to vote atattend the Annual Meeting. If youMeeting.

Q: How do not receive your confirmationI obtain a copy of beneficial ownership in time, bring your most recent brokerage statementAmpco’s Annual Report?

A: The Corporation’s 2021 Annual Report to Shareholders, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with youthe SEC, are available at http://www.ampcopittsburgh.com/investors. Copies of the exhibits to the 2021 Annual Meeting. We can use thatReport on Form 10-K will also be provided upon written request to verify your ownershipAmpco-Pittsburgh Corporation c/o Corporate Secretary at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106, free of Common Stockcharge. Copies of the 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K and admit you toexhibits may also be downloaded at no cost from the meeting; however, you willSEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K does not be able to vote your shares atform any part of the meeting.material for soliciting proxies.

Q: Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

A: We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and to publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

SOLICITATION
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE ELECTION OF PROXIES

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION (the “Corporation”) to be held on May 9, 2019. The first mailing of the proxy material to the shareholders is expected to be made on or about March 29, 2019.

The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Corporation. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by directors and employees, in person or by telephone, and brokers and nominees may be requested to send proxy material to and obtain proxies from their principals. The Corporation will pay the costs incurred for solicitations of proxies.


Any shareholder has the power to revoke the proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof. Revocation of the proxy will not be effective until notice thereof has been given to the Secretary of the Corporation, a duly executed proxy bearing a later date is presented or the shareholder subsequently votes the shares subject to the proxy.EACH OF THE BOARD’S NOMINEES ON PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSAL 2, AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 3USING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD OR VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM.

VOTING SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE

Only holders of record of Common Stock of the Corporation at the close of business on March 12, 2019, will be entitled to vote at the meeting. On that date, there were 12,494,846 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The holders of those shares are entitled to one vote per share. In the election of directors, the shares may be voted cumulatively. Cumulative voting means that the number of shares owned by each shareholder may be multiplied by the number of directors to be elected and that total voted for the nominees in any proportion. Shares that are not voted cumulatively are voted on a one vote per share basis for each nominee, except for those nominees, if any, for whom the shareholder is withholding authority to vote. If you return your signed proxy but do not indicate how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted non-cumulatively “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement or voted cumulatively for one or more of the nominees at the discretion of the Proxies; “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal; “FOR” approval of the Say-on-Pay Proposal; and “FOR” approval of the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.

REQUIRED VOTE

Under Pennsylvania law and the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, the presence of a quorum is required to transact business at the 2019 Annual Meeting. A quorum is defined as the presence, either in person or by proxy, of a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast at the meeting. For these purposes, shares that are present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be counted toward a quorum, regardless of whether the holder of the shares or proxy abstains with respect to or withholds authority to vote on a particular matter, whether a broker is present or represented by proxy but lacks discretionary voting authority with respect to any particular matter or whether a broker with discretionary authority fails to exercise such authority with respect to any particular matter.

Proposal 1—Election of Directors. With respect to the election of directors, the nominees who receive the most votes for the available positions will be elected. If you withhold authority to vote for a particular nominee on your proxy card, your vote will not count either “FOR” or “AGAINST” the nominee. Abstentions are not counted in the election of directors, and neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will affect the outcome.

Proposal 2—Articles Amendment Proposal.  The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Articles”) require the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 75% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in an annual election of directors, voting together as a single class, to amend the Articles, unless such amendment has been approved by at least a two-third vote of the whole Board of Directors, in which event the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in an annual election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required. Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Articles Amendment Proposal.

Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The approval of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required for advisory (non-binding) approval of our executive compensation program under the Say-on-Pay Proposal. The vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Corporation, the Compensation Committee or our Board. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will count as votes cast and neither will affect the outcome of the Say-on-Pay Proposal.

Proposal 4—Deloitte Ratification Proposal. With respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required for approval. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte, the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee, but Deloitte may still be retained. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will count as votes cast and neither will affect the outcome of the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.


If a broker indicates on its proxy that it does not have authority to vote certain shares held in “street name,” the shares not voted are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes occur when brokers do not have discretionary voting authority to vote certain shares held in street name on particular proposals under the rules of the NYSE, and the beneficial owner of those shares has not instructed the broker how to vote on those proposals. If you are a beneficial owner, your broker, bank or other nominee is permitted to exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposal 3, the Deloitte Ratification Proposal, even if it does not receive voting instructions from you. However, it is not permitted to exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposals 1 and 2 in the absence of voting instructions from you.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal 1)

AAs of the date of this Proxy Statement, Ampco’s Board of Directors comprises eleven members divided into the following three classes:

Class of 2022: Mr. Terry L. Dunlap; Ms. Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Mr. William K. Lieberman, and Dr. Laurence E. Paul;

Class of 2023: Mr. James J. Abel, Mr. Fredrick D. DiSanto, Mr. Darrel L. McNair, and Mr. Stephen E. Paul; and

Class of 2024: Mr. Michael I. German, Mr. J. Brett McBrayer, and Mr. Carl H. Pforzheimer, III.

Mr. Dunlap’s term will end at the 2022 Annual Meeting and he will retire from the Board. The Board and management of the Corporation express their sincerest gratitude to Mr. Dunlap for his service on the Board and as Chair of the Investment Committee.

13


Directors are elected for three-year terms. The terms for each class end in successive years. The Board of twoDirectors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, has nominated three incumbent directors willto stand for electionre-election for a three-year term of three yearsexpiring in 2025, Ms. Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Mr. William K. Lieberman, and Dr. Laurence E. Paul, and has also nominated Mr. Robert A. DeMichiei to fill the class of directors whose term expires in 2019. One of the two nomineesstand for election to the Board of Directors is currentlyfor a director. The nominees were recommendedthree-year term expiring in 2025.

Ms. Fessenden was most recently elected by the Nominating and Governance Committee and nominatedshareholders at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Mr. Lieberman was most recently elected by the shareholders at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  Dr. Paul was selected to fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors at its March meeting and have indicatedin February 2022.

The Board of Directors has determined that they are willingeach Board nominee qualifies as an independent director under NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

If any of the Board’s nominees is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve as a director, the Board of Directors may choose a substitute nominee. If any substitute nominees are designated, we will file an amended proxy statement that, as applicable, identifies the substitute nominees, discloses that such nominees have consented to being named in the revised proxy statement and to serve if elected, and includes certain biographical and other information about such nominees required by SEC rules. The persons named as proxies will vote for the remaining nominees and substitute nominees chosen by the Board.

Vote Required

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. “Plurality” means that the four nominees who receive the largest number of “FOR” votes of the shares entitled to be voted in the election for directors ifwill be elected. Votes that are withheld or shares that are not voted will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW. If at the time of the Annual Meeting a nominee should be unable or unwilling to stand for election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such person, if any, as may be selected by the Board of Directors to replace him or her.  MR. DEMICHIEI, MS. FESSENDEN, MR. LIEBERMAN AND DR. PAUL.

Summary of Director Attributes and Skills

Our directors have a diversity of experience that spans a broad range of industries and in the public and not-for-profit sectors. They bring to our Board a wide variety of skills, qualifications and viewpoints that strengthen the Board’s ability to carry out the Board’s oversight role on behalf of our shareholders. In the director biographies below, we describe certain areas of individual expertise that each director brings to our Board.

The table below is a summary of the range of skills and experiences that each continuing director and nominee brings to the Board. Because it is a summary, it does not include all of the skills, experiences, qualifications, and diversity that each director offers, and the fact that a particular experience, skill, or qualification is not listed does not mean that a director does not possess it.

Name

Abel

DeMichiei

DiSanto

Dunlap

Fessenden

German

Lieberman

McBrayer

McNair

L. Paul

S. Paul

Pforzheimer

Year of Joining Board

2014

Nominee

2022

2019

2017

2014

2004

2018

2022

2022

2002

1982

Experience:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Industry

X

 

 

X

X

X

 

X

X

X

X

 

International

X

X

 

X

X

 

 

X

 

X

X

 

Leadership

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

X

X

X

Public Company Board

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Risk Management

X

X

X

 

 

X

X

X

 

X

 

X

Technology

X

X

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Board of Directors’ Nominees

14


NomineeNominees for Director for a Term Whose Term of Office ExpiringExpires in 20222025:

ELIZABETH A. FESSENDEN (age 63,

Director since 2017).Since: 2017

Age: 66

Committees: Compensation Committee (Chair), Finance and Investment Committee and Executive Committee

Career Highlights and Qualifications: Prior to her retirement, Ms. Fessenden servedspent nearly three decades in severalcorporate leadership positionsroles at Alcoa Inc. from 1977 to 2005., including as president of the flexible packaging division and president of primary metals allied businesses. She also served in a number of operations roles with Alcoa. From 2006-2008, she was an operations principal with a private equity firm. Since 2008, she has been the principal of Fessenden Associates, a business consulting company. SheMs. Fessenden earned Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in engineering as well as a Master’s degree in business administration, all from Clarkson University.

Other Current Public Company Directorships: Alpha Metallurgical Resources; Meritor, Inc.; Fluence Energy

Other Current Affiliations
: Ms. Fessenden has been a member of the board of directors of Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE: AMR) since February 2021. Ms. Fessenden was appointed to the Board of Directors of Meritor, Inc. (NYSE: MTOR) in June 2021 and Fluence Energy (NASDAQ: FLNC) in October 2021. Ms. Fessenden also serves on the Board of Plan International, USA, a global girls’ rights organization.

Previous Directorships: Ms. Fessenden served as director of Quarles Petroleum since January of 2015. She alsofrom 2015 to 2021. Additionally, Ms. Fessenden served as a director of Cardno (ASX: CDD), from 2014 to 2015 and of O’Brien & Gere, from 2008 to 2014. Ms. Fessenden also served on the advisory board of Alloy Polymers and the board of directors of Polymer Group Inc. Ms. Fessenden was appointed to the Board effective as of August 10, 2017, to fill a newly created directorship.(OTC: POLGA).

Attributes and Skills: Ms. Fessenden’s extensive operations experience in the metals industry, her many years of service as a director of companies, and her broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that she should serve as a director.

TERRY L. DUNLAP (age 59, Nominated in 2019).ROBERT A. DEMICHIEI

Nominee

Age: 57


Career Highlights and Qualifications: Mr. Dunlap served in several leadership positions at Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, a global manufacturer of technically advanced specialty materials and complex components, from 1983 to 2014, where he last served asDeMichiei is the retired Executive Vice President ATI Flat-Rolled Products,and Chief Financial Officer of UPMC, a $20B+ nonprofit health system and leading health care provider and insurer. During his time at UPMC, Mr. DeMichiei implemented best practices in controllership, with UPMC achieving voluntary SOX 404 certification in 2006.  He also led UPMC’s activity-based costing/service-line implementation and Consumerism initiatives.  In addition to Finance, Mr. DeMichiei led the Supply Chain Management and Revenue Cycle functions, driving integration, technology infusion and process improvement/efficiency throughout the organization.  Mr. DeMichiei’s teams created a number of healthcare technology solutions, three of which were commercialized and spun-off. Before his 16-year tenure at UPMC, Mr. DeMichiei held various executive roles with the General Electric Company and Price Waterhouse in Pittsburgh. Mr. DeMichiei has a Bachelor’s degree in Business Economics from 2011 to 2014.the University of Pittsburgh.

Other Current Affiliations
: Mr. Dunlap has beenDeMichiei currently serves as a Board Director for Waystar, where he is the principal of Sweetwater LLC,Audit, Compliance and ESG Committee Chair, AAA East Central and Auto Club Enterprises. He also serves as a consulting and investment firm with a primary focus on metals and manufacturing, since January 2015.Strategic Advisor for Health Catalyst (NASDAQ; HCAT). Additionally, Mr. Dunlap has been a memberDeMichiei serves as the Board Chair of the boardUnited Way of directorsSouthwestern Pennsylvania and Finance Committee Chair of Matthews International since February 2015 and the boardSeton Hill University Board of directors of TimkenSteel since August 2015.Trustees. He is also an Executive Mentor for the Advanced Leadership Institute.

Previous Directorships: Mr. DeMichiei served on the board of directors of Elliott Group HoldingsCombineNet from 20152008 to 2010, and Prodigo Solutions from 2008 to 2019.  

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Dunlap’s extensive operationsDeMichiei’s diverse operational background and experience in the metals industry, years of board servicesuccessfully leading companies through growth and broad leadership experiencecomplex change led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

15


WILLIAM K. LIEBERMAN

Director Since: 2004
Age:
76
Committees:
Nominating and Governance Committee (Chair), Compensation Committee and Executive Committee

Career Highlights and Qualifications: Mr. Lieberman has been President of The Lieberman Companies, insurance brokerage and consulting company, for more than five years.

Attributes and Skills: In addition to more than forty years of management experience in the insurance, benefit and risk management areas, Mr. Lieberman has served as a director or trustee of many organizations including charitable companies, hospitals and universities. These qualifications led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

DR. LAURENCE E. PAUL

Director Since:2022; Previously served as Director from 1998-2008
Age: 57

Career Highlights and Qualifications: Dr. Paul has been a managing principal of Laurel Crown Partners, a private investment company, for more than five years.  From 1994 to 2001, Dr. Paul worked at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette and then Credit Suisse (NYSE: CS) in investment banking, including as a managing director in the Investment Banking Division. He became a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, a private investment company, in 2013. Dr. Paul holds an A.B. in biology from Harvard College, an M.D. from Harvard Medical School and an MBA from Stanford Business School.

Other Current and Prior Affiliations: Dr. Paul is currently a member of the board of directors for several non-profit organizations and portfolio companies including: Harvard Medical School’s Board of Fellows, Harvard Alumni Association, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Pittsburgh Steelers Football Club, Pro Football Hall of Fame, Crew Knitwear, Kova International, and Vereco. From 2006 to 2017, Dr. Paul was a member of the Board of Governors of the American Red Cross, during which time he served in many roles including Vice Chair of the Board and Chair of the audit committee.

Previous Directorships: Dr. Paul previously served on the board of directors of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation from 1998 to 2018. In addition, Dr. Paul served on the boards of directors of Soaring Eagle Acquisition Corp. from February 2021 to September 2021 and Flying Eagle Acquisition Corp. from May 2020 to December 2020.

Attribute and Skills: Dr. Paul has extensive experience in investing, sale of existing entities and general strategic and financial involvement and oversight of companies, including his leadership of international organizations led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 2021:2024:

MICHAEL I. GERMAN (age 68,

Director since 2014).Since: 2014

Age: 71

16


Committees: Audit Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee

Career Highlights and Qualifications:  Mr. German has beenis the Chief Executive Officer and President of Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation (formerly known as Corning Natural Gas Corporation), a holding company for natural gas and electric utilities, for more than five years.and has served in this role since December 2006.  Mr. German has been a director of Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation since 2014 (and a director of Corning Natural Gas Corporation from 2006 until 2014). Mr. German also serves as president of Corning Natural Gas Appliance Corporation (“Corning Appliance”), Pike County Light & Power Company (“Pike”), and isCorning Natural Gas’s joint venture investments, Leatherstocking Gas Company, LLC (“Leatherstocking Gas”) and Leatherstocking Pipeline Company, LLC (“Leatherstocking Pipeline”). Prior to joining Corning Natural Gas, he was senior vice president, utility operations for Southern Union Company where he was responsible for gas utility operations in Missouri, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. From 1994 to 2005, Mr. German held several senior positions at Energy East Corporation, a publicly held energy services and delivery company, including president of several utilities. From 1978 to 1994, Mr. German worked at the American Gas Association, finishing as senior vice president. From 1976 to 1978, Mr. German worked for the US Energy Research and Development Administration. Mr. German received a Bachelor of Arts in History from Trinity College, a Masters of Business Administration from Columbia University and a Juris Doctorate from Boston University Law School.

Other Current Public Company Directorships: Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation (OTC: CNIG)

Other Current Affiliations: Mr. German serves on the Boards of Directors of Leatherstocking Gas, Leatherstocking Pipeline, Pike, Three River Development Corporation and Northeast Gas Association, as well as the board of trustees of the Adirondack Park Institute.

Previous Directorships: Mr. German also wasserved as a director of Pennichuck Corporation from 2008 until 2011.

Attributes and Skills:  Mr. German’s experience as the chief executive officer of a public company, his many years of service as a director of companies and his broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.



J. BRETT MCBRAYER (age 53,

Director since 2018).Since: 2018

Age: 56

Committees: Executive Committee

Career Highlights and Qualifications
: Mr. McBrayer has served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer since July of 2018.  He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer at Airtex Products and ASC Industries, a global manufacturer and distributor of automotive aftermarket and OEM fuel and


water pumps, from 2012 through 2017. Airtex Products and ASC Industries, together with its parent company, UCI International LLC, and affiliated companies filed for bankruptcy protection in June 2016, successfully emerging in December 2016. Mr. McBrayer had also served as Vice President and General Manager of the Alcan Cable business at Rio Tinto Alcan, as Vice President and General Manager of the Specialty Metals Division at Precision Cast Parts Corporation, and held positions of various responsibility and leadership during his 20 years with Alcoa, Inc.(NYSE: AA)  Mr. McBrayer received a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering from the University of Tennessee and a Master of Arts in Applied Behavioral Science from Bastyr University.

Attributes and Skills:  Mr. McBrayer’s extensive experience in global industrial businesses and his broad executive leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

CARL H. PFORZHEIMER, III

Director Since: 1982
Age:
85
Committees:
Audit Committee (Chair), Nominating and Governance Committee and Executive Committee

17


Career Highlights and Qualifications: Mr. Pforzheimer has been Manager of Carl H. Pforzheimer & Co. LLC, an investment banking firm, or its predecessors or related entities for more than five years.

Previous Directorships: Mr. Pforzheimer served as a director of U. S. Trust Co. from 1999 until 2007.

Attributes and Skills:  In addition to the attendant investment advisory analytical skills gained from his role at Carl H. Pforzheimer & Co. LLC, Mr. Pforzheimer’s former role as Chair of the Audit and Risk Management Committees of U. S. Trust Co. led the Board to conclude Mr. Pforzheimer should serve as a director.

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 20202023:

JAMES J. ABEL (age 73,

Director since 2014).Since: 2014

Age: 76

Committees: Executive Committee (Chair)

Career Highlights and Qualifications: Prior to his retirement, Mr. Abel served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of CPI Corporation, an operator of portrait studios, from February 2012 to April 2013 and as a director from 2004 to April 2013.  Mr. Abel previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Financial Executives International, a firm representing senior financial executives in dealing with regulatory agencies involved with corporate financial reporting and internal controls, from May 2008 to February 2009.

Previous Directorships: Mr. Abel has served as a director of TheCPI Corporation (OTC: CPICQ) from 2014 until April 2013, and LGL Group, Inc. (NYSE: LGL), a globally-positioned producer of industrial and commercial electronic components and instruments, from 2011 until 2014.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Abel’s background as a senior executive, his expertise in financial management and his experience with manufacturing operations, as well as his board experience, led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

WILLIAM K. LIEBERMAN (age 71, FREDRICK D. DISANTO

Director since 2004).Since: 2022

Age: 59

Career Highlights and Qualifications: Mr. Lieberman has been PresidentDiSanto is the Chair and Chief Executive Officer of The Lieberman Companies, insurance brokerageAncora Group, a holding company that oversees three investment advisors, and consulting company, for more than five years.has served in such capacities since 2014 and 2006, respectively. Mr. DiSanto was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Maxus Investment Group from 1998 until December of 2000. In addition2001, after Maxus Investment Group was sold to more than forty yearsFifth Third Bank, Mr. DiSanto served as Executive Vice President and Manager of management experience in the insurance, benefit and risk management areas,Fifth Third Bank’s Investment Advisor Division.  Mr. LiebermanDiSanto has served since 2016 as a director or trustee of many organizations including charitableThe Eastern Company, a company that manages industrial businesses that design, manufacture and sell unique engineered solutions to niche markets, and is Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  He also currently serves as a director for Regional Brands, Inc., a privately held holding company seeking to acquire substantial ownership in regional companies hospitalswith strong brand recognition, stable revenues and universities. These qualifications ledprofitability. Mr. DiSanto previously served on the respective Boards of Directors of Alithya Group Inc., Axia Net Media Corporation and LNB Bancorp, Inc.  Mr. DiSanto holds a B.S. in Management Science and an MBA from Case Western Reserve University.

Other Current Public Company Directorships: The Eastern Company (NASDAQ: EML); Regional Brands, Inc. (OTC: RGBD)

Previous Directorships: Axia Net Media Corporation; LNB Bancorp, Inc.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. DiSanto is an experienced public company director and has knowledge and background in finance, strategic planning, governance, and international business. Pursuant to the Corporation’s obligations under the Cooperation Agreement, the Board to concludeconcluded that he should serve as a director.director

18


DARRELL L. MCNAIR

Director Since: 2022

Age: 59

Career Highlights and Qualifications: Mr. McNair is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of the MVP Group of Companies, a privately held group of companies which provide injection molding services, mechanical design engineering services and distribution of foam products to the automotive, medical, industrial, recreational industries and all five branches of the military, since 2000. Previously, Mr. McNair was Executive Director and a member of the board of directors of Detroit Neighborhood & Family Initiative, a non-profit organization sponsored by the Ford Foundation & Southeast Foundation serving various communities in the Detroit area, from 1999 to 2000; Owner & Chief Executive Officer for GERIC Home Health Care, Inc., a home health care organization serving residents in southeast Michigan, from 1996 to 1999; and held various positions at the Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F), an automotive company that designs, manufactures, and markets Ford vehicles worldwide, from 1988 to 1996. Mr. McNair is also currently a member of the board of directors of Medical Mutual of Ohio, the largest health insurance company based in Cleveland, Ohio, since May 2020. Mr. McNair received his M.B.A. in finance and marketing from Baldwin Wallace University and his B.G.S. in political science from Kent State University.

Other Current Affiliations: In addition, Mr. McNair is currently a board member, trustee and counsel to a number of civic and community organizations, including the Cleveland/Cuyahoga County Port Authority, The President’s Council, the Minority Business Financing Advisory Board, University Hospital, Northeast Ohio Medical University, ECM Chemicals, the Greater Cleveland Sports Commission, Crain’s Business Diversity Council, the Cleveland Federal Reserve Local Advisory Council and Jumpstart.

Attributes and Skills: With corporate experience at IBM and Ford, McNair also acquired businesses in the home health care and medical supply, construction, and retail industries throughout his entrepreneurial career. In addition, Mr. McNair has a passion for working with small businesses and mentoring young African Males. Professional accomplishments include civic engagement, personal standards, and community visibility. Pursuant to the Corporation’s obligations under the Cooperation Agreement, the Board concluded that he should serve as a director.


STEPHEN E. PAUL (age 51,
Director since 2002). Since: 2002
Age:
54
Committees: Compensation Committee and Finance and Investment Committee

Career Highlights and Qualifications: Mr. Paul has been a managing principal of Laurel Crown Partners, a private investment company, for more than five years. Prior to that he was a Vice President of Business Development at eToys, Inc., a web-based retailer focused exclusively on children’s products, and an Associate at Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette, Inc. He became a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, a private investment company, in 2013. Mr. Paul holds a bachelor’s degree from Cornell University and a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.

Other Current Affiliations: Mr. Paul serves on several boards of directors including Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., a professional sports entertainment organization, Kova International Inc., a leading developer, manufacturer and market of in vitro diagnostic products, and Five Four, Inc., a holding company for fashion brands and services.

Previous Directorships:  Mr. Paul served as a director of International Money Express, Inc. (Nasdaq: IMXI), a leading money remittance services company, from July 2018 to September 2020.  He also served as a director of Dynacast International Inc., a global manufacturer of small, engineered precision die cast components, from 2012 to 2015 and a director of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (NYSE: MRG), from 2003 to 2014.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Paul’s background in investment banking and private equity investment led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

19


CARL H. PFORZHEIMER, III (age 82,Process of Evaluation of Director since 1982). Mr. Pforzheimer has been Managing PartnerCandidates

The Nominating and Governance Committee makes a preliminary review of a prospective candidate’s background, career experience and qualifications based on available information or Managerinformation provided by an independent search firm which identifies or provides an assessment of Carl H. Pforzheimer & Co. LLC, an investment banking firm,a candidate or its predecessorsa shareholder nominating or related entities for more than five years. In additionsuggesting a candidate. If a consensus is reached by the committee that a particular candidate would likely contribute positively to the attendant investment advisory analyticalBoard’s mix of skills gainedand experiences, and a Board vacancy exists or is likely to occur, the candidate is contacted to confirm his or her interest and willingness to serve. The committee conducts interviews and may invite other Board members or senior Ampco executives to interview the candidate to assess the candidate’s overall qualifications. The committee considers the candidate against the criteria it has adopted in the context of the Board’s then current composition and the needs of the Board and its committees.

At the conclusion of this process, the committee reaches a conclusion and reports the results of its review to the full Board. The report includes a recommendation whether the candidate should be nominated for election to the Board. This procedure is the same for all candidates, including director candidates identified by shareholders.

The Nominating and Governance Committee may, from suchtime to time, retain the services of a position,search firm that specializes in identifying and evaluating director candidates. Services that may be provided by the search firm include identifying potential director candidates meeting criteria established by the committee, verifying information about the prospective candidate’s credentials, and obtaining a preliminary indication of interest and willingness to serve as a Board member.

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board nominated each of Mr. DeMichiei, Ms. Fessenden, Mr. Lieberman, and Dr. Paul for election to a three-year term as director by the shareholders at the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Director Compensation

Our non-employee director compensation program is designed to attract and retain outstanding director candidates who have the requisite experience and background as set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and to recognize the substantial time and effort necessary to exercise oversight of a complex organization like Ampco and fulfill the other responsibilities required of our directors. Mr. McBrayer, our sole employee director, does not receive additional compensation for his former role as chairmanBoard service.

The Compensation Committee reviews director compensation periodically, but at least once every three years, and recommends changes to the Board when it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee regularly engages an independent compensation consultant, Pay Governance LLC, to advise the Compensation Committee with respect to our director compensation program. In connection with its review, Pay Governance LLC assesses the structure of our director compensation program compared to competitive market practices of similarly situated companies. Based on the market information and recommendations provided to the Compensation Committee by Pay Governance LLC, and taking into account various factors, including the responsibilities of the directors generally, the responsibilities of the Board Chair and committee chairs, and Corporation’s performance, the Compensation Committee approved the compensation program for non-employee directors described below, effective May 6, 2021.

Director Fees

In 2021, each director who was not employed by the Corporation received an annual retainer of $40,000, payable quarterly in cash in equal installments.  The Board Chair received an additional $40,000 fee, the Chair of the Audit Committee received an additional $15,000 annual fee, the Chair of the Compensation Committee received an additional $10,000 fee, the Chair of the Nominating and Risk Management CommitteesGovernance Committee received an additional $7,500 fee, and the Chair of U. S. Trust Co. led the Finance and Investment Committee received an additional $7,500 fee. Further, members of Board committees received the following additional fees in lieu of per meeting fees: $7,500 for the Audit Committee, $5,000 for the Compensation Committee, $3,750 for the Nominating and Governance Committee, and $3,750 for the Finance and Investment Committee.  Directors do not receive additional meeting fees for Board or committee meetings.

20


Each non-employee director is also entitled to conclude Mr. Pforzheimer should serve as a director.receive an annual stock award.  Under our 2021 non-employee director compensation program, this annual stock award is valued at $70,000 and is based on the closing price of our Common Stock on grant date.


The following table describes the components of compensation for non-employee directors:


Annual Compensation Element

2021 Amount ($)

Cash Retainer for Non-employee Directors

40,000

Annual Equity Award for Non-employee Directors

70,000

Other Annual Cash Fees:

Board Chair Fee

40,000

Audit Committee Chair Fee (including Audit Committee Member Fee)

15,000

Audit Committee Member Fee

7,500

Compensation Committee Chair Fee (including Compensation Committee Member Fee)

10,000

Compensation Committee Member Fee

5,000

Nominating and Governance Committee Chair Fee (including Nominating and Governance Committee Member Fee)

7,500

Nominating and Governance Committee Member Fee

3,750

Finance and Investment Committee Chair Fee (including Finance and Investment Committee Member Fee)

7,500

Finance and Investment Committee Member Fee

3,750


2021 Director Compensation

The table below summarizes the director compensation earned by non-employee directors of the Corporation in 2021:

Name

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in

Cash($)(1)

 

 

Stock Awards

($)(2)

 

 

Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total ($)

 

James J. Abel

 

 

76,250

 

 

 

70,005

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

146,255

 

Terry L. Dunlap (3)

 

 

46,250

 

 

 

70,005

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

116,255

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

51,563

 

 

 

70,005

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

121,568

 

Michael I. German

 

 

51,250

 

 

 

70,005

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

121,255

 

William K. Lieberman

 

 

56,875

 

 

 

70,005

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

126,880

 

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

45,313

 

 

 

70,005

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

115,318

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

70,005

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

130,005

 

(1)

This column reflects annual cash retainer fees, including committee chair fees, as well as committee membership fees paid to each listed director.

(2)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the stock awards granted to directors. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

(3)

Mr. Dunlap’s term will expire at the 2022 Annual Meeting and he will retire from the Board.

Directors’ Alignment with Shareholders; Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have a long-standing approach of compensating executive officers and directors in part with stock awards and encouraging retention of stock acquired through such awards or by market purchases. We believe retention of stock creates a long-term perspective and aligns the interests of our directors and executive officers with those of our shareholders.

21


In 2020, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted new Stock Ownership Policy Guidelines requiring, among other things, non-employee Directors to hold stock at a target level of three times their annual cash retainer, or $120,000 for 2021.

Under the director compensation program, directors who were not in compliance with the ownership value requirement were not permitted to sell or transfer more than 50% of shares issued as part of the Corporation’s annual equity award for non-employee directors.

The following table shows the value of each non-employee director’s holdings in Ampco Common Stock as of March 9, 2022, based on the closing price of our Common Stock on NYSE on that date.

Non-employee Directors

 

Number of Shares Held (1)

 

 

Value of Shares Held ($)

 

James J. Abel

 

 

90,543

 

 

 

 

593,057

 

Fredrick D. DiSanto (2)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Terry L. Dunlap

 

 

46,124

 

 

 

 

302,112

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

64,638

 

 

 

 

423,379

 

Michael I. German

 

 

122,576

 

 

 

 

802,873

 

William K. Lieberman

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

163,750

 

Darrell J. McNair (2)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Laurence E. Paul (2)

 

 

33,456

 

 

 

 

219,137

 

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

74,580

 

 

 

 

488,499

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

 

86,116

 

 

 

 

564,060

 

(1)

The number of shares held included in this column include stock owned directly, stock owned jointly with, or separately, by a spouse and/or minor child, unvested restricted stock units, and performance shares that have achieved performance conditions.

(2)

Mr. DiSanto, Mr. McNair, and Dr. Paul joined the Board of Directors in February of 2022. Although there is no set period of time for Directors to achieve compliance with the stock ownership guidelines, Directors are not permitted to sell or transfer more than 50% of any Company-granted shares unless levels are met. Rather the Compensation Committee will review progress on an annual basis in the first quarter to ensure that all Directors are making continuous progress toward required ownership levels.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEProhibitions Against Short Sales, Hedging, Margin Accounts and Pledging

We have adopted an Insider Trading Policy, which prohibits members of the Board of Directors from pledging, engaging in short sales or hedging transactions with respect to any of their Ampco securities.  In addition, our directors are prohibited from holding Ampco securities in margin accounts that permit hedging arrangements or hold more than 0.05% of all outstanding shares of Ampco Common Stock. The policy continues to align the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders.


22


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Summary

Presented below are some highlights of our corporate governance practices and policies. You can find further details about these and other corporate governance practices and policies in the following pages of this Proxy Statement.

Our Board is currently comprised of 10eleven directors, a majorityten of whom have been determined by the Board to be independent. Because three of our directors are not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting, our Board adopted a resolution on March 6, 2019, to reduce the size of the Board to nine, as permitted by our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. Thus, immediately following the Annual Meeting, if Ms. Fessenden and Mr. Dunlap are elected to the Board by our shareholders, there will be eight directors on our Board, with one vacancy remaining.  Pursuant to the Shareholder SupportCooperation Agreement datedthe Board appointed Fredrick D. DiSanto and Darrell L. McNair to serve as directors of March 3, 2016, by and among the Corporation Altor Fund II GP Limited (“Altor Fund”),as members of the class of directors having a term expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting. The Cooperation Agreement will terminate upon the expiration of the earlier of (i) the date that is 30 days prior to the deadline for the submission of shareholder nominations for the 2023 Annual Meeting or (ii) the date that is 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the 2022 Annual Meeting, unless earlier terminated by mutual written agreement of Ampco-Pittsburgh and other signatories thereto, Altor Fund is entitled to designate one nominee to serve on our Board, until such time when Altor Fund and certain of its affiliates own, in the aggregate, less than 888,302 shares.  Altor Fund’s prior nominee, Mr. Fredrik Strömholm, resigned from the Board effective May 9, 2018, and Altor Fund has not designated another nominee since his resignation.Ancora Parties.  

We currently have separate non-executive ChairmanBoard Chair and Chief Executive Officer roles. On March 6, 2019, the Board elected James J. Abel to serve as our non-executive Chairman, effective as of May 9, 2019.

All of the Board’s standing committees, other than the Executive Committee, are composed entirely of independent directors, and each such standing committee has a written charter that is reviewed and reassessed annually.

Our Board of Directors oversees the Corporations’ risk management function, which covers, among other things, financial risk, legal/compliance risk, operational/strategic risk, reputational risk, emerging risk, cybersecurity risk and fraud risk, and utilizes key insights from the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee.

The Board of Directors routinely meets in executive session, both with the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and with only the non-employee directors.

The Nominating and Governance Committee periodically reviews qualifications for directors to our Board of Directors; in connection with an upcoming election of directors or vacancy on our Board, identifies candidates to serve as directors on the basis of such criteria; and recommends candidates to the Board for nomination on the basis of such criteria. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors considers director candidates recommended by shareholders on the same basis as other candidates.

Our bylaws allow shareholders to cumulate votes in the election of directors.

The Board of Directors annually reviews the Corporation’s succession plans for Executives.

We have an annual self-evaluation process for the Board and each standing committee, other than the Executive Committee.

The Board evaluates individual directors whose terms are nearing expiration and who may be proposed for re-election. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders on the same basis as other candidates.

The Board has designated Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, Chairman of our Audit Committee, as an “audit committee financial expert.” Our internal audit function reports directly to the Audit Committee.

We annually ask our shareholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of the Corporation’s independent auditors.

The Corporation hasConsistent with the recommendation of our shareholders, we have determined that itwe will hold a Say-on-Pay vote annually until the next shareholder vote on the frequency of such votes.annually.

Our strong corporate culture is reflected in our policies, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

Ourour Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of the Corporation’s officers, directors and employees, andas well as our additional Code of Ethics, which applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, areeach of which is available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.www.ampcopittsburgh.com

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors, officers and employees from hedging or short selling any of their Ampco securities.  In addition, our directors and executive officers subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) are prohibited from holding Ampco

23


securities in margin accounts that permit hedging arrangements or hold more than 0.05% of all outstanding shares of Ampco Common Stock.

The Board has adopted an anti-hedginga clawback policy pursuantin connection with short and long-term incentive plans. Pursuant to which, without prior approval, no director, officerthe policy, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or employeenegligence, to restate financial results for any restatement period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the Corporation at any time may purchase financial instruments that are designed to or that may reasonably be expected to have the effect of hedging or offsetting a decrease in the market valuepayout of any securities ofincentive compensation awards, the Corporation.Compensation Committee has the right, during the three-year period following the restatement period, to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment participants will be required to make.

The Board has adopted an anti-pledging policy pursuant to which officers and directors of the Corporation are prohibited from holding any securities of the Corporation in margin accounts or pledging any securities of the Corporation as collateral for any loan, subject to exceptions for de minimis pledging with prior approval.


The Board has adopted a clawback policy in connection with short and long-term incentive plans. Pursuant to the policy, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any restatement period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Compensation Committee has the right, during the three-year period following the restatement period, to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment participants will be required to make.

The Board has adopted a policy prohibiting excise tax gross-ups of perquisites pursuant to which the Corporation is prohibited from making any tax gross-up payments to executive officers, except for gross-ups applicable to management employees generally, such as an expatriate tax equalization payment.a relocation reimbursement policy.

The Board has adopted a whistleblower policy to protect any employee who, in good faith, reports incidents of unethical business conduct, violations of laws or accounting standards, internal accounting controls or audit standards or dangerdangerous to employees or public health and safety.

The Board has adopted Stock Ownership Policy Guidelines for the Corporation’s Directors and Executive Officers (“D&Os”) to align their interests with our shareholders and instill in our D&Os a meaningful economic interest in future performance.

The Corporation has an active and responsive investor relations program. In addition to timely earnings reporting and regular public conference calls, the Corporation deploys strategies to communicate the Corporation’s value proposition to the investment community. The firm also conducts investor outreach events, such as participation at independent investor conferences, non-deal roadshows, and other communications, providing an opportunity to engage with large groups of investors and prospective investors. The Corporation produces additional investor presentation materials supporting these events and makes them public via posting them to its investor relations website and/or filings with the SEC if and when appropriate.

Board Independence

The Board of Directors has adopted categorical standards to assist it in evaluating the independence of its directors.directors, which may be categorized as: (1) compliance with NYSE’s listing requirements, (2) non-material relationships with the Corporation, and (3) other facts and circumstances. The standards are attached to the Corporate Governance Guidelines which are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com. After performing this evaluation in accordance with those guidelines,evaluating each director on the basis of these standards, the Board has determined that James J. Abel, Leonard M. Carroll,Fredrick D. DiSanto, Terry L. Dunlap, Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Michael I. German, William K. Lieberman, Darrell L. McNair, Laurence E. Paul, Stephen E. Paul and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III and Ernest G. Siddons do not have material relationships with the Corporation (other than as members of the Board of Directors) and are independent within the meaning of the Corporation’s independence standards and those of the NYSE.

Audit Committee members must meet additional independence standards under NYSE listing standards and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).SEC. Specifically, Audit Committee members may not receive any compensation from the Corporationconsulting, advisory or compensatory fees other than their directors’ compensation. The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the enhanced standards of independence applicable to Audit Committee members under NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.

The Board has determined in its judgment that the Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent directors within the Corporation’s independence standards and those of the NYSE. In making its determination, the Board considered, among other things, the factors applicable to members of the Compensation Committee pursuant to NYSE listing standards and Rule 10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Act.

Leadership Structure

Mr. McBrayer is the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. Leonard M. Carroll currently serves asOfficer and is responsible for the non-executive Chairman.  On March 6, 2019,day-to-day operation of the Board voted to electCorporation. Mr. James J. Abel serves as non-executive Chairman Board Chair, and in such capacity presides at all meetings

24


of theour Board effectiveof Directors and serves as of May 9, 2019. The Chairman sets the agendas for and presides over the Board meetings. Mr. McBrayer is a member ofconduit between the Board and participates in its meetings.management. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Corporation at this time because it it:

allows for independent oversight of management,

increases management accountability, and

encourages an objective evaluation of management’s performance relative to compensation.

The Board will assess periodically whether the roles should be separated or combined based on its evaluation of what is in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders.

As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. McBrayer is the full-time executive managing the day-to-day operations of the Corporation.

Director Nominating Procedures

The Corporation’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and its Nominating and Governance Committee Charter charge the Nominating and Governance Committee with selecting nominees for election to the Board of Directors and with reviewing, at least annually, the qualifications of new and existing members of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee also considers the extent to which such members may be considered


“independent” “independent” within the meaning of applicable NYSE rules, as well as other appropriate factors, including overall skills and experience.

From time to time, the Nominating and Governance Committee will seek to identify potential candidates for director nominees and will consider potential candidates proposed by other members of the Board of Directors, by management of the Corporation or by shareholders of the Corporation.

In considering candidates submitted by shareholders of the Corporation, the Nominating and Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board of Directors and the candidate’s qualifications. To have a candidate considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must provide the information set forth in, and otherwise comply with, Section 18 of Article II of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated By-Laws.

The shareholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation “c/c/o Corporate Secretary”Secretary at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106 and, in order to allow for timely consideration, must be received not less than 90 days in advance of the anniversary date of the Corporation’s most recent annual meeting of shareholders.

Once a person has been identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee as a potential candidate, the Committee may collectreview and reviewconsider publicly available information regarding the person to assess whether the person should be considered further. Generally, if the person expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the candidate has the potential to be a good candidate, the Nominating and Governance Committee would seek to gather information from or about the candidate. Such information may include information gathered through one or more interviews as appropriate and review of his or her accomplishments and qualifications generally, in light of any other candidates that the Nominating and Governance Committee may be considering. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s evaluation process does not vary based on whether the candidate is recommended by a shareholder. Although the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal written diversity policy, it considers the diversity of our Board to be a priority and considers Board diversity as a whole, including the skills, background and experience of our directors.

Non-Management Directors

The non-management directors have regularly scheduled executive sessions. Any shareholder who wants to communicate directly with the presiding director or the non-management directors as a group can do so by following the procedure below under “Shareholder Communications with Directors”.

Shareholder Communications with Directors

The Board of Directors has established a process to receive communications from shareholders and other interested parties. To communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual director or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board of Directors or such individual or group or committee and sent to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation “c/o Corporate Secretary” at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106. Communications sent in this manner will be reviewed by the office of the Corporate Secretary for the purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to one or more of the Corporation’s directors. Depending on the subject matter, the Corporate Secretary may attempt to handle the inquiry directly, such as when it is a request for information about the Corporation or a stock-related matter. The Corporate Secretary also may not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature or it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors as a whole is responsible for risk management oversight of the Corporation and ensuring that management develops sound business strategies. The involvement of the full Board of Directors in setting the Corporation’s business strategy and objectives is integral to the Board’s assessment of our risk profile and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk and how best to manage any such risk. This involves receiving reports and/or presentations from applicable members of management, the Chief Risk Officer, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee of the Corporation, and the committees of the Board. The full Board of Directors


continually evaluates risks such as financial risk, legal/compliance risk, operational/strategic risk, cybersecurity risk and fraud risk and addresses individual risk issues with management throughout the year as necessary.

While the Board of Directors has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, the Board delegates responsibility for certain aspects of risk management to its standing committees. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on enterprise risks and related controls and procedures, including financial reporting, fraud and regulatory risks. The Compensation Committee strives to create compensation practices that do not encourage excessive levels of risk taking that would be inconsistent with the Corporation’s strategy and objectives. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Corporation’s corporate governance and corporate governance principles.

Director Terms

The Board is divided into three classes, and the directors in each class serve for three-year terms unless there is a need to adjust the number of Directors in a class or they are unable to continue to serve due to death, resignation, retirement or disability.disability or are otherwise removed from office during such term. The term of one class of directors expires each year at the Corporation’s annual meeting of shareholders. The Board may fill a vacancy by electing a new director to the same class as the director being replaced or by reassigning a director from another class. The Board also may create a new director position in any class and elect a director to hold the newly created position. In accordance with our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, all directors elected to fill vacancies shall hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders at which the term of the class to which they have been elected expires.

25


Voting for Directors

Ampco’s By-laws provide for cumulative voting in the event of a contested election. Accordingly, shareholders have the right to cumulate their votes by distributing a number of votes, determined by multiplying the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting (i.e., four) by the number of shares owned by such shareholder as of the close of business on the Record Date, to one individual nominee or among two or more nominees.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors as a whole is responsible for risk management oversight of the Corporation and ensuring that management develops sound business strategies. The involvement of the full Board of Directors in setting the Corporation’s business strategy and objectives is integral to the Board’s assessment of our risk profile and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk and how best to manage any such risk. This involves receiving reports and/or presentations from applicable members of management, the Chief Risk Officer, Chief Information Officer, and the committees of the Board. The full Board of Directors continually evaluates risks such as financial risk, legal/compliance risk, operational/strategic risk, reputational risk, emerging risk, cybersecurity risk and fraud risk and addresses individual risk issues with management throughout the year as necessary.

While the Board of Directors has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, the Board delegates responsibility for certain aspects of risk management to its standing committees. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on enterprise risks and related controls and procedures, including financial reporting, fraud and regulatory risks. The Compensation Committee strives to create compensation practices that do not encourage excessive levels of risk taking that would be inconsistent with the Corporation’s strategy and objectives. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Corporation’s corporate governance and corporate governance principles.

Executive Sessions

The non-management directors have regularly scheduled executive sessions, both with and without the Chief Executive Officer. Any security holder who wants to communicate directly with the presiding director, currently our Board Chair, or the non-management directors as a group can do so by following the procedure below under “Security Holder Communications with Directors”.

Security Holder Communications with Directors

The Board of Directors has established a process to receive communications from shareholders and other interested parties. To communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual director or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board of Directors or such individual or group or committee and sent to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation c/o Corporate Secretary at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106. Communications sent in this manner will be reviewed by the office of the Corporate Secretary for the purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to one or more of the Corporation’s directors. Depending on the subject matter, the Corporate Secretary may attempt to handle the inquiry directly, such as when it is a request for information about the Corporation or a stock-related matter. The Corporate Secretary also may not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature or it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.

Annual Meeting Attendance

The Corporation encourages its directors to attend the Annual Meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders. All of the directors then in office were in attendance at the 20182021 Annual Meeting.



BOARD COMMITTEES; DIRECTOR COMPENSATION; STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES26


BOARD COMMITTEES

Summary

During 2018,2021, the Board had fourfive standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Executive Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Finance and Investment Committee. The Board makes committee and committee chair assignments annually at its meeting immediately preceding the annual meeting of shareholders, although further changes to committee assignments may be made from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter, the Audit Committee Charter, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

The current composition of the Board and each committee of the Board is set forth below:

 

Director

 

Audit

Committee

 

 

Compensation

Committee

 

 

Executive

Committee

 

 

Nominating and

Corporate

Governance

Committee

 

 

Board of

Directors

 

 

Audit

Committee

 

 

Compensation

Committee

 

 

Executive

Committee

 

 

Finance and Investment

Committee (1)

 

 

Nominating and

Governance

Committee

 

 

Board of

Directors

 

James J. Abel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

Leonard M. Carroll1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

Terry L. Dunlap

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Michael I. German

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C (2)

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

William K. Lieberman

 

X

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Laurence E. Paul

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

Ernest G. Siddons

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

2018 Meetings

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

7

 

2021 Meetings

 

 

5

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

9

 

 

X—Member

C—Chair

 

1.  Messrs. Carroll, L. Paul and Siddons have notified the Corporation that they do not intend to stand for re-election and, therefore, their service as directors of the Corporation will end at the Annual Meeting.

(1)

In March 2022, the Board renamed the Investment Committee to the Finance and Investment Committee. The meetings included in this column occurred prior to such date.

(2)

Mr. German was appointed to the Finance and Investment Committee in March 2022.

All of the directors attended at least 75% of the applicable Board and committeeCommittee meetings in 2018 except for Mr. Dunlap, who was elected to the Board on March 6, 2019.2021.

The non-management directors meet separately in regularly scheduled executive sessions without members of management present, except to the extent that the non-management directors request the attendance of one or more members of management. The ChairmanBoard Chair presides over meetings of the non-management directors.

In addition, pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, the Corporation has also agreed to form a Business Improvement Advisory Committee within 120 days to support and make recommendations to the Board of Directors and support management’s review of business improvements and enhancements for the Corporation.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee held 5five meetings in 20182021 and was comprised of fourthree directors: Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (Chairman)(Chair), Michael I. German William K. Lieberman, and Ernest G. Siddons.  Ms. Ann E. Whitty, a former director ofTerry L. Dunlap. Subject to his re-election and following the Corporation who resigned in August of 2018, also served on2022 Annual Meeting, Dr. Paul will be appointed to the Audit Committee prior to her resignation.Committee. None of the Audit Committee members is now, or has within the past five years been, an employee of the Corporation. The Board has determined that none of the members of the Audit Committee have any financial or personal ties to the Corporation (other than director compensation and equity ownership as described in this Proxy Statement) and that they meet the NYSE and SEC standards for independence applicable to members of the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee reviews the Corporation’s accounting and reporting practices, including internal control procedures, and maintains a direct line of communication with the Directors and the independent accountants. The

27


Audit Committee also is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our


independent registered public accounting firm, including pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as evaluating the performance of our internal audit function and our financial reporting processes.

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Pforzheimer meets the SEC criteria to be deemed an “audit committee financial expert” and meets the NYSE standard of having accounting or related financial management expertise. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee met fivesix times in 20182021 and is comprised of three directors: Elizabeth A. Fessenden (Chair), William K. Lieberman (Chairman), Paul A. Gould (until May 2018), Elizabeth A. Fessenden (effective May 2018) and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III.Stephen E. Paul. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors compensation programs and policies and reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors the participation of executives and other key management employees in the various compensation plans of the Corporation.

The Compensation Committee, under the terms of its charter, has the sole authority to retain, approve fees and other terms for, and terminate any compensation consultant used to assist the Compensation Committee in executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee also may obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. In 2018,2021, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent provider of compensation consulting services for decisions relating to 20182021 compensation. The Committee can also utilizesutilize external legal advisors and assesses the independence of its advisors.

In 2020, the Compensation Committee was given oversight of aspects of the Corporation’s human capital management strategy that it may deem of importance to the long-term sustainability of the Corporation.

Certain executive officers of the Corporation attend meetings of the Compensation Committee from time to time and are given the opportunity to express their views on executive compensation matters.

Each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” of the Corporation as defined under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, and each member is also an “outside director” for the purposes of the corporate compensation provisions contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

None of our executive officers serves as a member of the compensation committee of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Compensation Committee.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee did not meet in 2018.2021. It is comprised of the following five directors: Leonard M. Carroll (Chairman), James J. Abel J. Brett McBrayer (effective July 2018)(Chair), Elizabeth A. Fessenden, William K. Lieberman, Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, and John S. Stanik (until July 2018).J. Brett McBrayer. This Committee is responsible for providing guidance and counsel to the Corporation’s management team on significant matters affecting the Corporation and taking action on behalf of the Board where required in exigent circumstances, such as where it is impracticable or infeasible to convene, or obtain the unanimous written consent of the full Board.

Finance and Investment Committee

The Investment Committee met three times in 2021 and was comprised of the following three directors: Terry L. Dunlap (Chair), Elizabeth A. Fessenden and Stephen E. Paul. In March 2022, the Investment Committee was renamed to the Finance and Investment Committee, and Mr. German was appointed to the Committee as Chairperson. This Committee is principally responsible for making recommendations to the Board in connection with the Company’s investment guidelines, investment asset allocations, and financing activities.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee met three times in 20182021 and was comprised of fourthree directors: Paul A. Gould (Chairman) (until May 2018), James J. Abel (Chairman effective May 2018), William K. Lieberman (Chair), Michael I. German and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. The Nominating and Governance

28


Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become directors and recommending candidates for membership on the Board of Directors and its committees, developing and recommending to the Board of Directors the Corporation’s corporate governance policies and reviewing the effectiveness of board governance, including overseeing an annual assessment of the performance of the Board of Directors and each of its committees.

Director Compensation

In 2018, each director who was not employed by the Corporation received an annual retainer of $40,000, payable quarterly in cash in equal installments. The Chairman of the Board received an additional $25,000 fee, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received an additional $15,000 annual fee, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee received an additional $10,000 fee, and the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee received an additional $7,500 fee. Further, members of Board committees received the following additional fees: $7,500 for the Audit committee, $5,000 for the Compensation committee, and $3,750 for the Nominating and Governance


Committee. Each non-employee director also received an annual stock award valued at $70,000. Directors do not receive meeting fees. The Compensation Committee reviews director compensation annually, in consultation with Pay Governance LLC, and considers whether changes are necessary.

The table below summarizes the director compensation earned by non-employee directors of the Corporation in 2018:

Name(1)

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in

Cash($)(2)

 

 

Stock Awards

($)(3)

 

 

Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total ($)

 

James J. Abel

 

 

45,938

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

115,938

 

Leonard M. Carroll

(5)

 

65,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

135,000

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

43,333

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

113,333

 

Michael I. German

 

 

47,500

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

117,500

 

Paul A. Gould

(4)

 

15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

15,000

 

William K. Lieberman

 

 

61,250

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

131,250

 

Laurence E. Paul

(5)

 

40,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

110,000

 

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

110,000

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

 

63,750

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

133,750

 

Ernest G. Siddons

(5)

 

47,500

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

117,500

 

Fredrik Strömholm

(4)

 

10,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

80,000

 

Ann E. Whitty

(4)

 

26,413

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

96,413

 

(1)

John S. Stanik has served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and as a director from January 1, 2015 until June 30, 2018. Mr. Stanik did not receive any compensation for his service on the Board of Directors in 2018. J. Brett McBrayer joined the Corporation as Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2018. He has served as a director since that time. Mr. McBrayer did not receive any compensation for his service on the Board of Directors in 2018.

(2)

This column reflects annual cash retainer fees, including committee chair fees, as well as committee membership fees paid to each listed director.

(3)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the stock awards granted to directors. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 15 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

(4)

Paul A. Gould did not run for re-election at the end of his three-year term which expired at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. Frederik Strömholm resigned from the Board of Directors effective May 9, 2018, due to personal reasons. Ann E. Whitty resigned from the Board of Directors effective August 7, 2018, due to personal reasons.

(5)

Leonard M. Carroll, Laurence E. Paul and Ernest G. Siddons have each notified the Corporation that they do not intend to stand for re-election and, therefore, their service as directors of the Corporation will end at the annual meeting.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have a long-standing approach of compensating directors in part with stock awards and encouraging retention of stock acquired through such awards or by market purchases. We believe retention of stock creates a long-term perspective and aligns the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders. In furtherance of this approach, the Board of Directors has established stock ownership guidelines for our CEO requiring the CEO to hold a minimum of 30,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, subject to certain exceptions for reasonable estate and tax planning and diversification purposes. Mr. McBrayer has five years to acquire the shares.


The Board of Directors is covered by a director stock ownership policy which provides that all directors must hold at least 1,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. All current directors satisfy this policy as of March 12, 2019. The Board of Directors will review these guidelines at least annually to evaluate whether they remain effective.

SECURITY OWNERSHIPOWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Beneficial Ownership of More Than Five Percent

The following table sets forth information, to the extent known by the Corporation, concerning individuals (other than directors or officers of the Corporation) or entities holding more than five percent of the outstanding shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock. The “percent of class” in the table below is calculated based upon 12,494,84619,190,536 shares outstanding as of March 12, 2019.9, 2022.

 

Name of beneficial owner

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

Mario J. Gabelli

(and entities which he controls or for which he acts as chief investment officer)

One Corporate Center

Rye, NY 10580

 

 

2,472,824

 

(1)

 

 

19.79

%

 

 

4,022,751

 

(1)

 

 

19.68

%

The Louis Berkman Investment Company

600 Grant Street, Suite 3230

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

 

 

3,644,615

 

(2)

 

 

17.91

%

Altor Fund II GP Limited

(and affiliates)

11-15 Seaton Place

St Helier

Jersey JE4 OQH

Channel Islands

 

 

1,776,604

 

(2)

 

 

14.22

%

 

 

1,776,604

 

(3)

 

 

9.26

%

The Louis Berkman Investment Company

600 Grant Street, Suite 3230

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

 

 

1,275,706

 

(3)

 

 

10.21

%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4)

Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road

Austin, TX, 78746

 

 

760,578

 

(4)

 

 

6.09

%

L. W. Van Loan Trust dated September 8, 2006, Edward F. Crawford and Crawford United Corporation

c/o The Crawford Group

6065 Parkland Boulevard

Cleveland, OH 44124

 

 

1,220,888

 

(4)

 

 

6.26

%

Ancora Funds, Ancora Alternatives, Ancora Holdings and Mr. Fredrick DiSanto

6060 Parkland Blvd

Suite 200

Cleveland, OH 44124

 

 

1,068,531

 

(5)

 

 

5.57

%

 

 

(1)

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on March 19, 2021, Mario J. Gabelli beneficially owns 4,022,751 shares of our Common Stock of which he has sole voting power with respect to 3,947,003 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,022,751 shares. Of the 4,022,751 common shares reported as beneficially owned, 1,252,988 are pursuant to Warrants to purchase common shares.

(2)

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on March 1, 2022, The Louis Berkman Investment Company beneficially owns 3,644,615 shares of our Common Stock and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares. Of the 3,644,615 common shares reported as beneficially owned, 1,161,426 are pursuant to Warrants to purchase common shares held by The Louis Berkman Investment Company which are exercisable prior to their expiration on August 1, 2025. Dr. Laurence E. Paul and Stephen E. Paul, each a director of the Corporation, own 34.69% and 34.28%, respectively, of The Louis Berkman Investment Company’s non-voting stock, held in various trusts.

29


(3)

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on September 26, 2018, Mario J. Gabelli beneficially owns 2,472,824 shares of our Common Stock and has sole dispositive and voting power with respect to such shares.

(2)

According to Schedule 13D filed on April 1, 2016,August 12, 2020, Altor Fund beneficially owns 1,776,604 shares of our Common Stock. Altor Fund has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by each of the reporting persons, as set forth in thesuch Schedule.

(3)

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on April 10, 2018, and Form 4 filed on July 31, 2018, The Louis Berkman Investment Company beneficially owns 1,275,706 shares of our Common Stock and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares.  Laurence E. Paul and Stephen E. Paul, directors of the Corporation, own 27.62% and 28.24%, respectively, of The Louis Berkman Investment Company’s non-voting stock, held in various trusts.

(4)

According to the Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on August 13, 2020, and amended Schedule 13G filed on October 1, 2020, February 1, 2021, April 9, 2021 and June 30, 2021 the L.W. Van Loan Trust dated September 8, 2019, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional Fund”) has sole2006, Ambassador Edward F. Crawford and Crawford United Corporation, have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 760,578916,444 shares of our outstanding Common Stock and sole voting power with respect to 714,763 shares of our Common Stock. Dimensional Fund is an investment adviser to four investment companies and furnishes investment advice to certain funds, trusts and separate accounts (the “Funds”). All shares of Common Stock underlying 681,999 Warrants, each exercisable to purchase 0.4464 common shares (representing 304,444 shares of Common Stock).  Such Warrants are owned by the Funds and Dimensional Fund disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities.exercisable prior to their expiration on August 1, 2025.

 


(5)

According to the 13D filed with the SEC on December 28, 2021 and amended on February 10, 2022, Ancora Merlin, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 49,705 shares, Ancora Merlin Institutional, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 484,535 shares, Ancora Catalyst, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 42,774 shares, Ancora Catalyst Institutional, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 491,517 shares, Ancora Alternatives LLC has shared voting and dispositive power for 1,068,531 shares, Ancora Holdings Group, LLC has shared voting and dispositive power for 1,068,531 shares and Fredrick DiSanto has shared voting and dispositive power for 1,068,531 shares.

Director and ExecutiveExecutive Officer Stock Ownership

 

The following table sets forth as of March 12, 2019,9, 2022, information concerning the beneficial ownership of the Corporation’s Common Stock by the Directors and Named Executive Officers and all Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation as a group. The “percent of class” in the table below is calculated based upon 12,494,84619,190,536 shares outstanding as of March 12, 2019.9, 2022.

 

Name of beneficial owner

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

3,738,448

 

(1)

 

 

18.35

%

Laurence E. Paul

 

 

1,298,837

 

(1)

 

 

10.4

%

 

 

3,688,396

 

(2)

 

 

18.11

%

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

1,298,837

 

(2)

 

 

10.4

%

Rose Hoover

 

 

79,512

 

(3)

 

*

 

Fredrick D. DiSanto

 

 

1,068,531

 

(3)

 

 

5.57

%

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

180,209

 

(4)

 

*

 

Michael I. German

 

 

172,720

 

(5)

 

*

 

Rose Hoover (6)

 

 

158,125

 

(7)

 

*

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

 

41,733

 

(4)

 

*

 

 

 

108,436

 

(8)

 

*

 

James J. Abel

 

 

41,266

 

(5)

 

*

 

 

 

107,624

 

(9)

 

*

 

Ernest G. Siddons

 

 

26,138

 

(6)

 

*

 

Leonard M. Carroll

 

 

25,631

 

(5)

 

*

 

Michael I. German

 

 

25,266

 

(5)

 

*

 

Terrence W. Kenny (10)

 

 

100,159

 

(11)

 

*

 

Terry L. Dunlap (12)

 

 

55,052

 

(13)

 

*

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

64,638

 

(14)

 

*

 

William K. Lieberman

 

 

25,131

 

(7)

 

*

 

 

 

25,000

 

(15)

 

*

 

John S. Stanik

 

 

21,036

 

(10)

 

*

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

8,541

 

(8)

 

*

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

7,217

 

(6)

 

*

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

4,000

 

(5)

 

*

 

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (18 persons)

 

 

1,740,695

 

(9)

 

 

13.9

%

Robert A. DeMichiei

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

Darrell L. McNair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (16 persons)

 

 

5,970,109

 

(16)

 

 

28.77

%

 

*

Less than 1%

(1)

Represents 23,13174,580 shares owned directly, and 1,275,70619,253 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase common shares held directly by Mr. Paul, 2,483,189 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company and 1,161,426 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase common shares held by The Louis Berkman Investment Company. Mr. Paul is a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and is a trustee of various trusts which own 27.62%34.28% of its non-voting stock.

30


(2)

Represents 23,13133,456 shares owned directly, and 1,275,70610,325 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase common shares held directly by Dr. Paul, 2,483,189 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company and 1,161,426 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase common shares held by The Louis Berkman Investment Company. Mr.Dr. Paul is a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and is a trustee of various trusts which own 28.24%34.69% of its non-voting stock.

(3)

According to the 13D filed with the SEC on December 28, 2021 and amended on February 10, 2022, Ancora Merlin, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 49,705 shares, Ancora Merlin Institutional, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 484,535 shares, Ancora Catalyst, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 42,774 shares, Ancora Catalyst Institutional, LP has shared voting and dispositive power for 491,517 shares, Ancora Alternatives LLC has shared voting and dispositive power for 1,068,531 shares, Ancora Holdings Group, LLC has shared voting and dispositive power for 1,068,531 shares and Fredrick DiSanto has shared voting and dispositive power for 1,068,531 shares.

(4)

Represents 6,95871,136 shares held directly, 39,652 restricted stock units that will vest within sixty days, 55,136 performance stock unit shares that he has the right to acquire within 60 days and 14,285 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase Common Stock.

(5)

Represents 112,576 shares held directly, 10,000 shares held joint with his spouse and 50,144 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase Common Stock.

(6)

Ms. Hoover retired as President and Chief Administrative Officer on December 31, 2021.

(7)

Represents 119,161 shares owned directly, 66,00034,500 shares that she has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options, and 6,554 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.4,464 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase Common Stock.

(4)(8)

Includes 40,00084,516 shares owned directly, 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee and principal beneficiary, and the following shares in which he disclaims beneficial ownership: 133 shares held by his daughter and 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee.trustee in which he disclaims beneficial ownership, and 22,320 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase Common Stock.

(5)(9)

Represents 90,543 shares held directly and 17,081 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase Common Stock.

(10)

Mr. Kenny retired as President of Air & Liquid Systems Corporation on December 31, 2021.

(11)

Represents 59,268 shares held directly, 34,500 shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options, and 6,391 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase Common Stock.

(12)

Terry L. Dunlap’s term will end at the 2022 Annual Meeting and he will retire from the Board.

(13)

Represents 46,124 shares held directly and 8,928 shares pursuant to Warrants to purchase Common Stock.

(14)

Represents 64,638 shares held directly.

(6)(15)

Includes 2,000Represents 25,000 shares held jointly with his wife and 24,138 shares owned directly.spouse.

(7)

Includes 3,000 shares held jointly with his wife and 22,131 shares owned directly.

(8)

Represents 3,612 shares held directly and 4,929 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.

(9)(16)

Excludes double counting of shares deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one director.

(10)  Represents 21,036 shares held directly. Mr. Stanik retired from the Corporation on June 30, 2018.  

Unless otherwise indicated, the individuals named have sole investment and voting power.

NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(Proposal 2)

The Board is committed to a compensation philosophy and program that promotes our ability to attract, retain and motivate individuals who can achieve superior results for Ampco, its shareholders and its other stakeholders. As part of that commitment, and in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a)14A of the Exchange Act, requiresshareholders are being asked to approve, in an advisory non-binding resolution, the Corporation’s directors,compensation of our named executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock, to file reports of holdings and transactionsas disclosed in


the Corporation’s common stock with the SEC and to furnish the Corporation with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based on those records and other information furnished, during 2018, executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock complied with all filing requirements.


PROPOSAL TO AMEND OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF THE CORPORATION’S COMMON STOCK FROM 20,000,000 SHARES TO 40,000,000 SHARES

(Proposal 2)

On March 6, 2019, the Board of directors approved a this Proxy Statement. This proposal to amendis our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 20,000,000 to 40,000,000.

The proposed amendment would replace the first sentence of Article FIFTH of the Articles of Incorporation with the following language:

“The authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall be 3,000,000 shares of Preference Stock, without par value, and 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the par value of $1 per share.”

A copy of the proposed amendment is attached hereto as Annex A (the “Amendment”).

Effect of Increase in Authorized Shares

Following the effectiveness of the increase in authorized shares, current holders of common stock will own the same number of shares of common stock than prior to the increase. The Amendment will not change the terms of the common stock and the additional shares of common stock to be authorized pursuant to the Amendment would have rights identical to the currently outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The Amendment will not affect the rights of current holders of the company’s common stock, none of whom have preemptive or similar rights to acquire the newly authorized shares.  Each shareholder’s percentage ownership of outstanding common stock will not be altered. The par value of the common stock will not change, and the outstanding common stock will remain fully paid and non-assessable. 

Purposes of the Articles Amendment Proposal

Article FIFTH of the Articles of Incorporation authorizes the Corporation to issue 20,000,000 shares of common stock.  The authorization was established in 1985.  

As of March 12, 2019, the record date for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

(i)

12,494,846 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding;

(ii)

797,854 shares are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and upon vesting of restricted stock units; and

(iii)

760,375 unallocated shares of common stock are available for future awards under the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Corporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock in order to give the Corporation greater flexibility and responsiveness in considering and planning for future corporate needs, including, but not limited to, stock dividends, grants under equity compensation plans, stock splits, financing activities, potential strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, and business combinations, as well as other general corporate transactions. The Board believes that additional authorized shares of common stock will enable the company to take timely advantage of market conditions and other opportunities that become available to the Corporation without the delay and expense associated with convening a special meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders.


Potential Risks Associated with the Amendment

The Corporation has no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of the additional shares of common stock that will result from the Corporation’s adoption of the Amendment.  On September 27, 2018 the Corporation filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC in connection with the possible offering of subscription rights to our existing common shareholders to purchase units consisting of shares of common stock and warrants (the “Potential Offering”).  On November 5, 2018 the Corporation announced a postponement of the Potential Offering.  While the Corporation has no current plan or binding commitments for any transactions at this time, there can be no assurance that the Corporation will not undertake the Potential Offering or any other transaction in the future.  If the Amendment is approved, the Corporation may use some of the shares of common stock that would become available for issuance as a result for the Potential Offering or other potential transactions involving equity securities.

Except as otherwise required by law or by a regulation of the New York Stock Exchange, the newly authorized shares of common stock will be available for issuance at the discretion of the Board (without further action by the shareholders) for various future corporate needs, including those outlined above. While adoption of the Amendment would not have any immediate dilutive effect on the proportionate voting power or other rights of the Corporation’s existing shareholders, any future issuance of additional authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock may, among other things, dilute the earnings per share and book value of the common stock and the voting rights of those holding common stock at the time the additional shares are issued.

In addition to the corporate purposes mentioned above, an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock may make it more difficult to, or discourage an attempt to, obtain control of the Corporation by means of a takeover bid that the board of directors determines is not in the best interest of the Corporation and its shareholders, as additional shares of common stock could be issued to dilute the stock ownership and voting power of, or increase the cost to, a party seeking to obtain control of the Corporation. However, the Board of directors is not aware of any attempt or plan to obtain control of the Corporation.

Vote Required

Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal.

If the Amendment is approved, it will become effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which will occur as soon as practicable after the approval.

The board recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock FROM 20,000,000 SHARES TO 40,000,000 SHARES.



ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(Proposal
3)

“Say-on-Pay” proposal. The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Corporation or the Board. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will carefully review

31


the opinions that our shareholders express and will take the outcome of the vote into account when making decisions regarding executive compensation. Our Board of Directors adopted a policy to hold this advisory vote on executive compensation annually.

We believe that the Say-on-Pay vote represents an additional means by which we may obtain important feedback from our shareholders about executive compensation. As set forth in the Executive Compensation Overview on the following page, the overall objectives of our executive compensation program are to provide compensation that is competitive, create a structure that is based on achievement of performance goals and provide incentive for long-term continued employment.

In accordance withUpon consideration of the voting results for the proposal considered at the Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders regarding the frequency of advisory Say-on-Pay votes, the CorporationBoard of Directors determined to hold an advisory Say-on-Pay vote annually untilannually. Shareholders will have the opportunity to next shareholderprovide an advisory vote on the frequency of such advisory Say-on-Pay votes.votes which is required in 2023. The Board will consider the results of such vote following the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders.

Shareholders are encouraged to read the Executive Compensation Overview, starting on page 24,33, which discusses how the elements of the compensation packages for the named executive officers are determined, and review the Summary Compensation Table and the other related information following the Summary Compensation Table. The Board and the Compensation Committee believe that the Corporation’s policies and procedures on executive compensation are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders and are effective in achieving the strategic goals of the Corporation. The Say-on-Pay vote gives you, as a shareholder, the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation program by voting for or against the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Corporation”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Corporation’s proxy statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Executive Compensation Overview, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS RESOLUTION AND THEREBY ENDORSE THE CORPORATION’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION32


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OVERVIEW

OurIn this CD&A we summarize the compensation awarded to our executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 45. We refer to these executive officers as our “named executive officers” or “NEOs.”

Executive Compensation Overview describes the key features of our executive compensation program for 20182021 for our “named executive officers”:

20182021 Named Executive Officers

 

Name

 

Title (as of last day of 2018)2021)

J. Brett McBrayer

 

Chief Executive Officer (as of 7/1/2018)

John S. Stanik

Former Chief Executive Officer (until 6/30/2018)

Michael G. McAuley

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Rose Hoover(1)

 

President and Chief Administrative Officer

Terrence W. Kenny (2)

President of Air & Liquid Systems Corporation

 

(1)

Ms. Hoover retired as President and Chief Administrative Officer on December 31, 2021.

(2)

Mr. Kenny retired as President of Air & Liquid Systems Corporation on December 31, 2021.

We have divided this discussion into five parts:

 

1.

20182021 Highlights

 

2.

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

 

3.

20182021 Compensation Objectives and Governance

 

4.

20182021 Compensation Decisions

 

5.

Other Compensation Practices and Policies

2018 HIGHLIGHTS2021 HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

The 2018Under the oversight of our Compensation Committee, our compensation structure is designed to provide a competitive compensation structure that will retain top performers and incentivize individuals’ performance and enhance shareholder value in a responsible manner. In keeping with this design, the 2021 executive compensation program features a balanced mix of salary and performance-driven annual and long-term incentive award opportunities. The chart below illustrates the target compensation opportunities in 20182021 for Mr. McBrayer, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO,” and also referred to as our Principal“Principal Executive OfficerOfficer” or “PEO”) (note that.

33


(1) The percentages are based on the chart depicts the full annual opportunity, while Mr. McBrayer would only be eligible for the 50%approved base salary of the total opportunity since his employment withCEO at the Corporation began on July 1, 2018).time the compensation structure was established in March 2021.

 

 


Despite an [•] increaseUnder our executive compensation program, our named executive officers are eligible to earn bonuses under the short-term incentive program, based on our 2021 business performance results, which illustrates our pay-for-performance philosophy and also motivates our executive officers to continue to focus their efforts on improvements in total revenue from continuing operations, 2018 was a challenging year forthe overall financial results of the Corporation.  Our Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment generated record sales toThe bonuses earned under the oil and gas industry but experienced a significant contractionshort-term incentive program are driven by the positive results in the second half of the year due to inventory corrections in the frac block supply chain.  In addition, results from continuing operations in 2018 reflected several negative factors that impacted the segment, including higher costs of raw materials and key production materials, key equipment reliability issues, resulting in shipment delays and maintenance costs and idle capacity at one of our cast roll plants. The Air and Liquid Processing segment, performed well in 2018, increasingwhich exceeded its revenue by approximately [•]%.

Overall,threshold level. No payouts were earned relative to the Forged and Cast Engineered Products (“FCEP”) segment did not achieve its 2018 goal related to income from operations, a key metric in our compensation program. The Air and Liquid Processing segment exceeded its operating income goal. The Corporation was not able to achievegoal, nor the adjusted earnings per share (“EPS”) goal.

Based on these business performance results, Each of the named executive officers forfeitedare also eligible to earn annual incentive awards based on personal performance.  

This CD&A describes the design and 2021 compensation decisions for each of our named executive officers.  As described below, Ms. Hoover and Mr. Kenny each retired, effective December 31, 2021, and entered into agreements with us regarding their accelerated retirement, which impacted the amount paid to them in fiscal year 2021.  Please see “Retirement of Ms. Hoover” and “Retirement of Mr. Kenny” for a significant amountdescription of the compensation decisions made in 2018, which exhibits our pay-for-performance philosophy.  Specifically,connection with the award related to the Forgedaccelerated retirements of Ms. Hoover and Cast Engineered Products segment income from operations was forfeited.  Further, because the 2018 EPS threshold goal was not achieved,Mr. Kenny, respectively.

In addition, the portion of the 2018 annualour 2019-2021 long-term incentive award(“LTI”) program related to EPSrelative total shareholder Return (“rTSR”) was also forfeited. In addition, since the 2018 EPS threshold goal was not achieved, the portions of the 2016-2018 and the 2017-2019 performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards related to EPS were forfeited.achieved.  The threshold for the relative total shareholder returnPSU Return on Invested Capital (“TSR”ROIC”) portion of the 2016-20182019-2021 PSUs was also not achieved, and as a result, that portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs2019-2021 PSU was also forfeited. The named executive officers did receive annual incentive awards related to the Air and Liquid Systems segment income from operations. Each of the named executive officers also received annual incentive awards based on personal performance.


KEY FEATURESKEY FEATURES OFOUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

 

Our Compensation Committee (also referred to as the “Committee”) believes that our executive compensation program includes key features that align the interests of our named executive officers and the Corporation’s long-term strategic direction with the interests of our shareholders and does not includeis designed to avoid features that could misalign their interests.

 

34


   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

KEY FEATURES

    

 

 

 

 

•     Align CEO Pay with Corporate Performance:

A significant portion of our CEO’s actual pay is tied to annual performance goals and long-term shareholder returns. A majority of long-term incentive awards granted during 2021 to our CEO were provided as PSUs.

 

 

 

 

•     Use Long-Term Incentives to Link a Significant Portion of Named Executive Officer Pay to Company Performance:

A significant portion of pay for our named executive officers is long-term incentives linked to growing earnings per shareReturn on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) and relative total shareholder return.return (“rTSR”).

 

 

 

 

•     Balance Short-Term and Long-Term Incentives:

Our incentive programs provide an appropriate balance of annual and long-term incentives and include multiple measures of performance.

 

 

 

 

•     Use of Performance Metrics:

A significant portion of each executive’s annual pay is based on objective performance metrics. Our executive compensation program is designed so that a significant portion of compensation is “at-risk” based on corporate performance, as well as equity-based in order to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

•     Cap Incentive Awards:

Annual incentive awards and PSUs include capped payouts (200% for annual incentives and 150%200% for PSUs).

 

 

 

 

•     Mitigate Excessive Risk-taking Behaviors by Named Executive Officers:

Our executive compensation program includes features that reduce the possibility of our named executive officers, either individually or as a group, making excessively risky business decisions that could maximize short-term results at the expense of long-term value.value, such as a cap on annual incentive awards

 

 

 

 

•     Authorize the Board to Claw Back Executive Compensation:

We have implemented a clawback policy applicable to executive officers pursuant to which, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any Restatement Periodrestatement period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Committee has the right during the three-year period following the Restatement Periodrestatement period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment executives will be required to make.

 

 

 

 

•     Use of Independent Compensation Consultant:

In 2018,2021, the Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC, a compensation consulting firm, to assist itthe Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities and duties. Pay Governance LLC does not provide any other services to the Corporation. The Committee utilizes executive sessions with Pay Governance LLC without management present to enhance governance.

•     Advice of Independent Compensation Consultant:

    The Committee is kept apprised of current trends in executive compensation by Pay Governance LLC, its independent compensation advisor, and regularly considers implementing appropriate changes to its executive compensation program.

 

 

 

 

•     Use of Peer Group:

The Compensation Committee periodically checks its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities. The same peer group is used to determine our relative performance for vesting of a portion of PSU awards.

 

 

 

 

•     Multi-Year Vesting Periods:

The equity awards granted to our executive officers are earned over multi-year periods, consistent with current practice and our retention objectives.

•     Use Our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, provides for a minimum vesting requirement of Performance Metrics:

A significant portion of each executive’s annual pay is based on objective performance metrics. Our executive compensation program is designed so that a significant portion of compensation is “at-risk” based on corporate performance, as well as equity-based to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.not less than one year for all award types.

 

 

 

 

•     No Section 280G Tax Gross-Up Rights:

We do not provide any Code Section 280G excise tax gross-up rights or any other significant tax gross-up rights to our executive officers.officers other than for reasonable and customary relocation expenses.

 

 

 

 

•     No Option Repricing or Replacement without Shareholder Approval:

The Corporation’s 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan prohibits “underwater” options from being repriced or replaced (either with new options or other equity awards), unless approved by our shareholders.

 

 

35


•     Tally Sheets:

In order to make well informed compensation decisions, the Committee reviews tally sheets that include each executive’s current and historical compensation amounts, stock ownership, and retirement amounts, as well as amounts owed by the Corporation upon various termination scenarios.

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 


2018 COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES2021 COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES

 

 

The compensation paid or awarded to our named executive officers for 20182021 was designed to meet the following objectives:

Provide compensation that is competitive with compensation for executive officers providing comparable services, taking into account the size of the Corporation, the nature of its business, and the location of its headquarters.headquarters in order to attract and retain executive talent. We refer to this objective as “competitive compensation.”

Create a compensation structure under which a meaningful portion of total compensation is based on achievement of performance goals relating to the Corporation’s and the individuals’ performance and also to the enhancement of shareholder value. We refer to this objective as the “performance incentive.”

Provide an incentive for long-term continued employment with us. We refer to this objective as the “retention incentive.”

We believe various components of our 20182021 compensation payments and awards meet the following objectives:

 

Type of Compensation

 

Objectives Addressed

Salary

 

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Incentive Bonus Plan Awards

 

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Restricted Stock Units

 

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

Performance Stock Units

 

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Retention Incentives

Change in Control Severance Protection

 

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

SERPSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan Benefits

 

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

 

In 2018,2021, compensation decisions for our CEO were made by the Compensation Committee and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors. The CompensationAdditionally, the Committee in consultation with the CEO, made a recommendationrecommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to director compensation. Finally, the Committee made compensation anddecisions, in consultation with the CEO, with respect to the compensation of the executive officers whothat report directly to the CEO, including eachboth of the other named executive officers. In assessing competitive compensation, the Committee relied primarily on recommendations provided by Pay Governance LLC, as the Committee’s independent compensation consultants.consultant, prepares a competitive assessment of executive compensation on an annual basis. With the analysis provided by and the perspective of the consultant, the Committee makes determinations regarding executive compensation.

2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

The Committee generally targets executive total target direct compensation opportunities at the 50th percentile of the peer group. Total target direct compensation is defined as the sum of base salary, target annual cash bonus and the target grant-date value of long-term incentive awards.

36


2021 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

 

 

Salaries

New salary levels for our named executive officers were established in AprilMarch of 2018, except that Mr. Stanik’s2021, and our CEO’s salary was not changed due to his planned departure fromfurther adjusted in August of 2021. Determinations by the Corporation upon his retirement. DeterminationsCommittee regarding salary adjustments are made based on a number of objective and subjective factors, including cost of living increases,competitive market data, internal equity, the Corporation’s financial performance, and a qualitative analysis of each individual officer’s performance during the preceding year, taking into account such factors as leadership, commitment and execution of corporate initiatives and special projects assigned by the Board, the ChairmanBoard Chair, or the CEO. The Committee does not use a formula to calculate base salary adjustments for the CEO and other executive officers.  We also consider whether there has been any material change in thean executive officer’s title, duties and responsibilities in the preceding year. Where an executive officer has assumed material additional duties, or has been promoted, an above-normal salary adjustment would typically be justified. Finally, in rare circumstances, we may decide to make a market adjustment in salaries if we determine that salary levels for one or more of our named executive officers have fallen materially below levels that we consider appropriate in order to maintain a competitive compensation package and to discourage valued executives from leaving to pursue other opportunities. Salary adjustments for our CEO and other named executive officers are reviewed


and must be approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors, after a recommendation by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is solely responsible for determining all other executive officer compensation decisions.

Generally, the differences in the level of pay between the named executive officers is the result of the determination by the Committee or by the CEO, over time, thatregarding the level of responsibility, function, experience, and length of service that each of the officers possess.

The base salary determinations for each named executive officer in 20182021 were as follows:

 

Name

 

2018 Base

Pre-Adjustment

Salary($)

 

 

2018 Base

Adjusted

Salary($)

 

 

Percentage

Increase

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

n/a

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

n/a

 

John S. Stanik

 

 

630,000

 

 

 

630,000

 

 

0%

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

348,000

 

 

 

358,400

 

 

3%

 

Rose Hoover

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

384,400

 

 

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key Incentive Plan Changes in 2018

In 2017, our Compensation Committee conducted a comprehensive review of the design of both the annual incentive and the long-term incentive plans and made certain changes which became effective in 2018. The Committee believes that the new design will continue to provide performance-based compensation opportunities tied to measurable performance goals that will drive long-term shareholder value.

The 2018 changes to the Annual Incentive Plan include:

The annual incentive is based 70% on the business performance and 30% on individual performance. With respect to the 70% business performance portion, 50% of it will be based on operating income and 50% - on the Corporation’s EPS.

Name

 

2021 Base Pre-Adjustment Salary ($)

 

 

2021 Base Adjusted Salary ($) (1)

 

 

Percentage

Increase

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

643,000

 

 

7.2%

 

Rose Hoover

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

420,000

 

 

5.0%

 

Terrence W. Kenny

 

 

366,250

 

 

 

370,000

 

 

1.0%

 

For the executives at the corporate level, the operating income portion of the annual incentive is based on the performance of both business segments of the Corporation. For business segment leaders, 100% of the operating income portion of the annual incentive will be based on the performance of the relevant segment.

The 2018 changes to the Long-Term Incentive Plan include:

The long-term incentive awards continue to be based on a mix of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and PSUs. However, the RSUs will be weighted 33% of the total long-term incentive opportunity and PSUs will be weighted 67% of the total long-term incentive opportunity. With respect to the PSUs, 50% of the PSUs will be based on Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) and 50% will be based on relative TSR, each of which will be measured over a three-year performance period.

The Compensation Committee believes that moving the EPS metric from the long-term incentive into the annual incentive ensures that all participants are focused on improving the Corporation’s EPS. In addition, replacing the EPS


portion of the long-term incentive with ROIC puts emphasis on the improvement of long-term returns on capital, rather than short-term EPS.

 

(1)

Reflects final base adjusted salary after giving effect to all adjustments in 2021.

Annual Incentive Plan  

The annual incentive bonus plan is designed to incentivize performance in three categories: (i) business performance in our operating segments, (ii) earnings per share for the Corporation, and (iii) personal performance. The annual incentive bonus plan award for 20182021 for each named executive officer was determined using the following formula:

Target Annual Performance

      X

35% Weighting

    X

Business Segment Performance Achievement

     =

Business Performance Portion of Annual Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

     +

 

Target Annual Performance

      X

35% Weighting

    X

Corporate EPS

     =

Corporate EPS Portion of Annual Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

     +

 

Target Annual Performance

      X

30% Weighting

    X

Personal Goal Achievement to Improve Their Area of Responsibility

     =

Personal Performance Portion of Annual Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Award

37


Threshold, target and maximum levels were set for the performance goals, such that no amount would be paid for performance below threshold, 50% of target would be paid for performance at threshold, and no more than 200% of target would be paid for performance at or above maximum.  In addition, if the threshold level of Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) is not achieved, payouts for the achievement of personal goals are capped at the target level.level to emphasize financial stewardship.

Target Annual Incentive AwardsAdjustments to Reported Financial Results.. TargetThe Committee reviews our financial performance following the end of the year and retains the authority to adjust our reported financial results for items causing significant differences from assumptions contained in our business plan. The Committee has adopted a set of guidelines to help it evaluate potential adjustments.  These guidelines are intended to better reflect executives’ line-of-sight and ability to affect performance results, avoid artificial inflation or deflation of awards due to unusual or non-recurring items and emphasize long-term and sustainable growth. Adjustments for 2020 annual incentive awards were established byprimarily included asbestos-related costs in excess of plan and certain restructuring costs pursuant to reorganization-related activities. While the Compensation Committee as a percentagewas mindful of base salary for each named executive officer, intendingthe impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and various pandemic mitigations on the business, there was no need to provide a competitive bonus opportunity alignedmake changes to the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and historic pay, as follows:threshold, target or maximum levels of the 2021 approved annual incentive plan.

Name

 

Target Annual

Incentive

As % of Base Salary

 

 

Target

Annual

Incentive

Amount

 

J. Brett McBrayer(1)

 

75%

 

 

$

412,500

 

John S. Stanik

 

85%

 

 

$

535,500

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

50%

 

 

$

174,000

 

Rose Hoover

 

50%

 

 

$

187,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Mr. McBrayer’s annual incentive is to be pro-rated for 6 months only (to $206,225) since his employment began on July 1, 2018.

 

Business Performance Goals (Weighted 35%). The business performance portion of the annual incentive was based on goals related to the income from operations achieved by the two business segments of the Corporation, the Forged and Cast Engineered Products SegmentFCEP segment (weighted at 25%) and the Air and Liquid Processing Segmentsegment (weighted at 10%), as compared to the segments’ business plans for 2018.2021. We weighted the FCEP segment more heavily since it is larger than the Air and Liquid Processing segment, as determined based on revenue. Income from operations was chosen by the Compensation Committee in the belief that it is the most accurate objective measure of business performance. The Compensation Committee eliminates most charges or windfalls which are generally beyond the control of the executives and adjusts actual and planned income to allow for the exclusion, for example, of cost changes related to asbestos litigation, adjustments for acquisitions or divestitures, changes in accounting standards, and other similar changes. charges.


 

Business Segment

Operating Income Goals for 2018 (in $000’s)

 

Forged and Cast

Engineered Products

Segment (25% weight)

 

 

Air and Liquid

Processing

Segment (10% weight)

 

 

Performance

Achievement Level

 

Payout

Percentage

(of Target

Award)

 

Less than 7,000

 

 

Less than 8,000

 

 

Below Threshold

 

0%

 

7,000

 

 

 

8,000

 

 

Threshold

 

50%

 

13,921

 

 

 

10,112

 

 

Target

 

100%

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

12,000

 

 

Maximum

 

200%

 

Business Segment

Operating Income Goals for 2021 (in $000’s)

 

FCEP

segment (25% weight)

 

 

Air and Liquid

Processing

segment (10% weight)

 

 

Performance

Achievement Level

 

Payout

Percentage

(of Target

Award)

 

Less than 4,500

 

 

Less than 8,600

 

 

Below Threshold

 

0%

 

4,500

 

 

 

8,600

 

 

Threshold

 

50%

 

7,300

 

 

 

10,100

 

 

Target

 

100%

 

 

11,500

 

 

 

10,600

 

 

Maximum

 

200%

 

 

 

Corporate EPS (Weighted 35%).  The Corporate EPS portion of the annual incentive was based on the 20182021 earnings per share of the Corporation.  For this purpose, “EPS” means the Corporation’s net income per common share (basic) for each year during the performance period, adjusted as determined by the Committee to exclude the effect of certain items, such as asset write-downs or impairment charges, restructuring-related costs, litigation or claim costs, judgments or settlements, including asbestos claims and defense costs; and the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results.  results..

The following table shows the EPS portion of the design.

Corporate EPS Performance Goals

 

Achievement

 

% of EPS Portion

Target Earned

 

 

2018 EPS

Goals

 

 

 

2021 EPS

Goals

 

 

Payout Percentage

(of target award)

 

 

Below Threshold

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

Threshold

 

75%

 

 

$

-0.26

 

 

 

$

0.00

 

 

50%

 

 

Target

 

100%

 

 

$

0.26

 

 

 

$

0.36

 

 

100%

 

 

Maximum

 

150%

 

 

$

0.52

 

 

 

$

0.62

 

 

200%

 

 

38


 

 

Personal Performance Goals (Weighted 30%). The Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, personal performance goals for each of the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee ultimately exercises informed judgment in determining the degree to which individual performance goals are achieved.

 

2018Target Annual Incentive Awards. Target annual incentive awards were established by the Compensation Committee as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer, intending to provide a competitive bonus opportunity aligned to the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and historic pay, as follows:

Name

 

Target Annual

Incentive

As % of Base Salary

 

 

Target

Annual

Incentive

Amount

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

100%

 

 

$

643,000

 

Rose Hoover

 

55%

 

 

$

231,000

 

Terrence W. Kenny

 

50%

 

 

$

185,000

 

2021 Annual Incentive Award Decisions Based on Performance. Our named executive officers achieved the following results under the annual incentive bonus plan:

Business Performance Portion: The Forged and Cast Engineered ProductsFCEP segment had an operating lossincome for 2018,2021 which was belowdid not exceed the threshold level of performance for that business segment, resulting in no payout for that portion of the 20182021 annual incentive award for the named executive officers. The Air and Liquid Processing segment’s operating income, as adjusted, exceeded thewas between target and maximum level of performance, resulting in the payment above target for that portion of the 20182021 annual incentive award for the named executive officers.

Corporate EPS: The Corporation did not meet its 2018Corporation’s 2021 EPS goal,was below threshold, resulting in no payout for that portion of the annual incentive award for the named executive officers.  payout.

Personal Performance Goals: Lastly, the named executive officers earned varying levels of payouts based on their personal performance in 20182021 against previously determined goals (with nogoals.

In the first quarter of 2021, the Committee also approved the strategic objectives set for each named executive officer and the associated payout exceeding alevels for fiscal 2021.  Participants had the ability to earn between 50% and 200% of the target amount based on the overall achievement of the applicable 2021 strategic objectives set for each participant.  Since the threshold level since the 2018of EPS goal was not met, as requiredachieved, each executive officer’s strategic objectives were capped at target. The strategic objectives approved by the termsCommittee for each of the annual incentive program).  named executive officers and the related performance categories, were as follows:

39


Name

Performance Categories

Objective

J. Brett McBrayer

Strategic Plan Update

Identify opportunities for improved performance through strategic review of operations, customer base, new markets, and products

Achieved attainment was between target and maximum but capped at 100% due to not achieving EPS threshold.

Strategic Initiatives/Restructuring Analysis

Evaluate strategic restructuring options to maximize market value and improve shareholder return

Rose Hoover

Strategic Initiatives/ Profit Improvement

Manage our long-term liability obligations to reduce cost without adding additional risk

See “Executive Officer Retirements in 2021” for a description of Ms. Hoover’s compensation decisions under the annual incentive bonus plan.

Strategic Initiatives/ESG Recognition

Evaluate and develop path forward for Corporate ESG reporting

Terrence W. Kenny

Strategic Initiatives/Restructuring Analysis

Evaluate strategic restructuring options to maximize market value and improve shareholder return

See “Executive Officer Retirements in 2021” for a description of Mr. Kenny’s compensation decisions under the annual incentive bonus plan.

Strategic Initiatives/Safety

Introduce and implement safety assessment and education programs

The Compensation Committee approved the following annual incentive awards for the named executive officers for 2018,2021, which are included in the Summary Compensation Table for 20182021 under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”:  

 

Name

 

Target Annual

Incentive Award

 

 

Business

Performance

Portion

(70% weighting)

 

 

+

 

Personal

Performance

Portion

(30% weighting)

 

 

=

 

Actual

Annual Incentive

Award

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

$

412,500

 

 

$

28,380

 

 

 

 

$

61,875

 

 

 

 

$

90,255

 

John S. Stanik (1)

 

$

535,500

 

 

$

36,842

 

 

+

 

$

35,745

 

 

 

 

$

72,587

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

$

174,000

 

 

$

24,658

 

 

+

 

$

53,760

 

 

 

 

$

78,418

 

Rose Hoover

 

$

187,500

 

 

$

26,447

 

 

+

 

$

57,660

 

 

 

 

$

84,107

 

Name

 

Target Annual

Incentive Award

 

 

Business

Performance

Portion Achieved

(70% weighting)

 

 

+

 

Personal

Performance

Portion Achieved

(30% weighting)

 

 

=

 

Actual

Annual Incentive

Award

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

$

643,000

 

 

$

39,830

 

 

 

 

$

192,900

 

 

 

 

$

232,730

 

Rose Hoover (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrence W. Kenny (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1) See “Executive Officer Retirements in 2021” for a description of compensation decisions under the annual incentive bonus plan for Ms. Hoover and Mr. Kenny, respectively.

 

(1) Pursuant toFor each of the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between Mr. Stanik andAnnual Performance components of the Corporation Mr. Stanik is entitled to a payment of a pro rata portion of his short-termannual incentive award, for the 2018 fiscal year, in the amount of $72,587, which is to be paid to him in 2019 in shares of common stock of the Corporation, rather than cash.    

results between threshold and target or between target and maximum are interpolated on a straight-line basis.

 

Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Corporation has adopted the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan under which the Compensation Committee may grant the named executive officers and other key employees a variety of types of equity-based awards. The Compensation Committee believes that annual grants of equity-based awards serve the purpose of aligning the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders. Vesting conditions for equity-based awards also encourage executive retention. Before 2015, the Corporation had the practice of making annual grants of stock options. Since 2015, the Compensation Committee has not granted stock options and instead follows a practice of granting long-term incentive awards in the form of annual grants of PSUs (vesting based on performance over a three-year performance period)

40


and RSUs (vesting based on continued employment over three years)at the time of each vesting anniversary). The Compensation Committee believes the current mix of equity incentive awards further ties pay to our Corporation’s performance while also aligning interests with our Corporation’s long-term shareholders and encouraging retention.

Target Award Amounts. The Compensation Committee sets a target dollar amount for the value of long-term incentive awards granted each year, intending to provide a competitive long-term incentive award opportunity aligned to the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and historic pay,pay. Those target amounts for 2021 were as follows:

 

Name

 

Target Long-Term

Incentive

As % of Base Salary

 

 

Target

Long-Term

Incentive

Amount

 

 

Target Long-Term

Incentive

As % of Base Salary (1)

 

 

Target

Long-Term

Incentive

Amount

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

110.0%

 

 

$

605,000

 

 

150%

 

 

$

937,500

 

John S. Stanik

 

105.1%

 

 

$

662,000

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

56.92%

 

 

$

204,000

 

Rose Hoover

 

71.54%

 

 

$

275,000

 

 

80%

 

 

$

336,000

 

Terrence W. Kenny

 

70%

 

 

$

259,000

 

(1)

Based on the base salary at the time long-term incentive awards were granted.

 

Whether the named executive officers realize these target amounts depends on our Corporation’s financial results and stock price performance and the executive’s continued employment with us.

Mix of Awards: PSUs and RSUs. Beginning in 2015,In 2021, the Compensation Committee determinedmade a determination that the long-term incentive awards for the named executive officers should be provided in a balanced mix of RSUs, weighted 30%33%, and PSUs, weighted 70%. For 2018, the Compensation Committee adjusted the weighting to be 33% in RSUs and 67% in PSUs.order to correct the mix of performance incentives and retentive incentives.  This weighting, and the performance requirements for PSUs discussed below, is intended to further align the compensation realized by our named executive officers over time with the Corporation’s performance. The PSUs, to the extent earned based on performance, do not vest until the anniversary of the grant date following the end of the performance period, and the RSUs vest in three equal annual installments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date, to further encourage executive retention. Consistent with past practice, the grants are made on or about the same date as our annual meeting of shareholders for each year.

Performance Design for PSUs. PSUs become earned based on the Corporation’s performance over a three-year performance period, 2018-2020.from 2021 to 2023. The Compensation Committee determined that the performance vesting conditions should be based on a mix of our performance against annually determined goals regarding ROIC, weighted 34% of the total long-term incentive award opportunity (including the RSUs), and our TSRrTSR as compared against a peer group over the performance period, weighted 33% of the total long-term incentive award opportunity (including the RSUs). The ROIC (calculated as net income divided by the sum of average total debt and shareholders’ equity) performance is measured as percentage point improvement in the Corporation’s ROIC in 2020 versus ROIC in 2017, subject to certain adjustments for mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, foreign exchange fluctuations and accounting changes, among other items, which the Committee deems appropriate. TSRrTSR performance ensures that compensation results are tied to our relative performance against our peers. For the 2019 and 2020 performance plans, PSU target ranges for ROIC were based on the final year ROIC of the respective performance periods. For the 2021 performance plan, the ROIC target range was based on a 3-year average ROIC over the performance period.

 

The following table shows the ROIC design.design:


ROIC Performance Goals

(34% of Total Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunity)

Achievement

 

ROIC Target Improvement

 

% of ROIC Portion

Target Earned

 

Below Threshold

 

less than 5%

 

0%

 

Threshold

 

5%

 

50%

 

Target

 

10%

 

100%

 

Maximum

 

15%

 

200%

 

 

Achievement

% of ROIC Portion

Target Earned

Below Threshold

0%

Threshold

50%

Target

100%

Maximum

200%

The following table shows the relative TSRrTSR design. TSRrTSR includes cumulative cash dividends (without interest) declared during the performance period. To guard against stock price volatility, the beginning and ending stock prices

41


for determining relative TSRrTSR are based on an 11-dayeleven-trading day average using the closing price on the applicable date +/-5- 5 trading days.

Relative TSRrTSR Performance Goals

(33% of Total Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunity)

 

Achievement

 

TSRrTSR Percentile Rank

 

% of TSRrTSR Portion

Target Earned

 

Below Threshold

 

Below 25th percentile

 

0%

 

Threshold

 

25th percentile

 

50%

 

Target

 

50th percentile

 

100%

 

Maximum

 

75th percentile and above

 

200%

 

 

The peer companies for this purpose selected by the Compensation Committee are the same as used by the Compensation Committee to view the competitiveness of our executive compensation program, as discussed further below.

For each of the ROIC and relative TSRrTSR performance goals, results between threshold and target or between target and maximum are interpolated on a straight-line basis.

20182021 Results for PSUs.  The relative TSRrTSR for the 2016-20182018-2020 PSUs was achieved at 177.2% of the target goal resulting in PSUs related to rTSR being earned by participants in the 2019 LTI program. ROIC performed below the 25th25th percentile and as a result that portion of the 2016-20182019-2021 PSUs was forfeited.  ROIC improvement

Executive Officer Retirements in 2021

On December 31, 2021, Ms. Hoover and Mr. Kenny retired as executive officers of the Corporation. In connection with their accelerated retirements, we entered into agreements with each of Ms. Hoover and Mr. Kenny, which are summarized as follows:

Retirement of Ms. Hoover. In connection with Ms. Hoover’s accelerated retirement, Ms. Hoover and the Corporation entered into a Retirement and Consulting Agreement (the “Hoover Retirement Agreement”) on October 21, 2021. In addition to any other benefits Ms. Hoover is measured overentitled to in connection with her retirement, as consideration for Ms. Hoover to execute a three-year period, therefore, no PSUs will be awarded for 2018 forgeneral release of claims, the ROICCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors agreed to provide Ms. Hoover with the following on her retirement date (less applicable payroll deductions and withholding): (i) $175,000, equal to five months of salary at her current base rate; (ii) $40,400, equal to five weeks of vacation pay; (iii) $231,000 pursuant to her 2021 short term incentive plan award, assuming target level performance; (iv) accelerated vesting of the unvested portion of the award.  As described above, priorrestricted stock units and unvested performance share units granted in 2019, 2020, and 2021; and (v) $5,000 for health care costs for five months.

Under the terms of the Hoover Retirement Agreement, Ms. Hoover will also provide the Corporation with consulting services at the rate of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) per hour for up to 2018,40 hours each month. In addition, Ms. Hoover will be entitled to personal use of Corporation-provided technology, continued use or right to purchase a portion of long-term incentive awards was tiedCorporation-provided automobile, and certain other expenses incidental to Ms. Hoover’s services. The Hoover Retirement Agreement terminates on December 31, 2024, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the Corporation’s EPS.  For 2018, our EPS for purposesHoover Retirement Agreement or extended by mutual agreement of the outstanding PSU awards was belowparties (the “Consulting Period”).

Retirement of Mr. Kenny. In connection with Mr. Kenny’s accelerated retirement, Mr. Kenny and the threshold goal setCompany entered into a Retirement Agreement (the “Kenny Retirement Agreement” and together with the Hoover Retirement Agreement, “the Retirement Agreements”) on October 21, 2021. In addition to any other benefits Mr. Kenny is entitled to in connection with his retirement, as consideration for year 2018 ($(.26)), therefore,Mr. Kenny to execute a general release of claims, the portionCompensation Committee of the 2016-2018 PSUsBoard of Directors agreed to provide Mr. Kenny with the following on his retirement date (less applicable payroll deductions and 2017-2019 PSUs relatedwithholding): (i) $154,167, equal to five months of salary at his current base rate; (ii) $35,600, equal to five weeks of vacation pay; (iii) $185,000 pursuant to his 2021 short term incentive plan award, assuming target level performance; (iv) accelerated vesting of 9,953 unvested restricted stock units, 13,400 Unvested performance share units; and (v) $8,800 for health care expenses.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

42


We have a long-standing approach of compensating executive officers in part with stock awards and encouraging retention of stock acquired through such awards or by market purchases. We believe retention of stock creates a long-term perspective and aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders

In 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted new Stock Ownership Policy Guidelines requiring, among other things, (i) the CEO to hold stock at a target level of three times his base salary; and (ii) other Executive Officers to hold stock at a target level of one times their base salaries.

Rather than a period of time requirement for achieving compliance with the guidelines, directors and officers are not permitted to sell or transfer more that 50% of any Corporation-granted shares until their guideline ownership levels have been met. The Compensation Committee reviews progress to ownership levels on an annual basis.

As CEO of the company, Mr. McBrayer is required to hold stock valued at three times his base salary, or $1,929,000 in 2021. As of March 9, 2022, based on the closing price of our Common Stock on NYSE on that date, Mr. McBrayer held stock valued at $1,396,727, which includes unvested restricted stock units and performance share units. As Ms. Hoover and Mr. Kenny retired as of December 31, 2021, they are no longer subject to the 2018 EPS was forfeited.  stock ownership guidelines.

O
THER COMPENSATION PRACTICESOTHER COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES POLICIES

 

 

See “Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program” above for a summary of a number of key policies and practices designed to result in a balanced executive compensation program that encourages appropriate, and not excessive, levels of risk taking by our named executive officers. Below are certain additional policies and practices regarding our program:

Use of Peer Companies

The Compensation Committee periodically checks its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities for our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses this information for general context on executive compensation practices and levels in the market and does not have a formal policy to benchmark compensation mix or levels for the named executive officers to a specified competitive level against these peers.

The Compensation Committee most recently considered the appropriate peer companies in 2018.2021. At that time,


the Compensation Committee approved a list of 1720 peer manufacturing companies, taking into account size and complexity of the business of these peer companies based on revenue, total assets and market cap. At the time established, the CorporationCorporation’s size approximated the median size of the peer companies in revenues, was above the median in assets and below median in market cap. The peer company list approved in 20182021 is as follows:

 

Badger Meter Inc.

Chase Corporation

DMC Global Inc.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc.

FreightCar America, Inc.

Gorman-Rupp Co.

 

Hardinge Inc.

Haynes International, Inc.

Hurco Companies Inc.

Insteel Industries, Inc.

Kadant Inc.

LB Foster Co.Company

Lindsay Corporation

Lydall, Inc.

 

Manitex International, Inc.

NN Inc.

Northwest Pipe Company

Synalloy Corporation

Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.

Twin Disc, Incorporated

Universal Stainless &

Alloy Products Inc.

 

Ongoing and Post-Employment Agreements

In 2018, the Board of Directors adopted the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Executive Severance Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”) for key executive officers of the Corporation other than the CEO (whose severance benefits arewere addressed in his offer letter). The Executive Severance Plan expired on its terms in 2020 and was not renewed. We also have a legacy supplemental executive retirement plan that enables certain of our named executive officers to accrue retirement benefits as the executive continues to work for us, as well as change in control agreements

43


that could provide severance benefits upon a change in control. These plans and agreements are designed to be a part of a competitive compensation package. The plans and agreements described below do not include plans that are generally available to all of our salaried employees:

Executive Severance Plan — The Board has adopted the Executive Severance Plan which provides severance benefits to key executive officers of the Corporation, other than the CEO, in the event of a termination by the Corporation without “cause” or by a participant for “good reason”.  The named executive officers who participate in the Executive Severance Plan are Mr. Michael G. McAuley and Ms. Rose Hoover.  The Executive Severance Plan is described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) — We maintain a SERP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides benefits for executives in excess of the benefits that may be provided under our tax qualified defined benefit retirement plan (“Plan”) as a result of limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The SERP also provides additional payment rights and benefits in the event of a change in control. The only named executive officerofficers who participatesparticipate in the SERP isare Ms. Rose Hoover.Hoover and Mr. Terrence Kenny.  The SERP is described under “Retirement Benefits” below.

 

Change in Control Agreements — We have change in control agreements with respect to each of our executive officers so that our executive officers remain focused on the interests of the Corporation and the shareholders, rather than their personal circumstances, in the context of a potential change in control. Our agreements with executivesexecutive officers provide for payments and other benefits only if we terminate an executive’sexecutive officer’s employment without cause or if the executive officer terminates employment for “good reason” within 24 months following a change in control. The Change in Control agreements are described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Tax Considerations

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any oneanyone named executive officer in any calendar year. Under the tax rules in effect before 2018, compensation that qualified as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) was deductible without regard to this $1 million limit. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law December 22, 2017, eliminated this performance-based compensation exception effective January 1, 2018, subject to a special rule that “grandfathers” certain awards and arrangements that were in effect on or before November 2, 2017. As a result, compensation that the Compensation Committee structured in 2017 and prior years with the intent of qualifying as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) that is paid on or after January 1, 2018 may not be fully deductible, depending on the application of the special grandfather rules. Moreover, from and after January 1, 2018, compensation awarded in excess of $1 million to our named executive officers generally will not be deductible. Given our current compensation levels, the potential impact of Section 162(m) has not been a material consideration for the Committee. While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act


may limit the deductibility of compensation paid to the named executive officers in the future, the Committee will—consistent with its past practice—design compensation programs that are in the best long-term interests of the Corporation and our shareholders, with deductibility of compensation being one of a variety of considerations taken into account.

44


SUMMARY COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION TABLE

Summary compensation information for our named executive officers for 20182021 is set forth in the following table:

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

 

(d)

 

 

(e)

 

 

(f)

 

 

(g)

 

 

(h)

 

 

(i)

 

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

 

(d)

 

 

(e)

 

 

(f)

 

 

(g)

 

 

(h)

 

 

(i)

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

($)

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

 

 

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)

 

 

Total ($)

 

 

Year

($)

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

 

 

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)

 

 

Total ($)

 

PEO—J. Brett McBrayer

 

2018

 

 

275,004

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

429,772

 

 

 

90,255

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

258,555

 

 

 

1,153,586

 

 

2021

 

 

632,250

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

937,510

 

 

 

232,727

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

27,582

 

 

 

1,830,069

 

Chief Executive Officer (as of July 1, 2018)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PEO—John S. Stanik

 

2018

 

 

315,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

167,150

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

31,715

 

 

 

513,865

 

Chief Executive Officer (through June 30, 2018)

 

2017

 

 

627,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

595,168

 

 

 

476,803

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30,242

 

 

 

1,729,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PFO—Michael G. McAuley,

 

2018

 

 

355,800

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

242,882

 

 

 

78,418

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

31,429

 

 

 

708,529

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial

 

2017

 

 

346,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

166,740

 

 

 

173,720

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

26,013

 

 

 

712,473

 

Officer and Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer (as of July 1, 2018-Present)

 

2020

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

393,514

 

 

 

806,887

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

36,600

 

 

 

1,837,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rose Hoover,

 

2018

 

 

382,050

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

319,340

 

 

 

84,107

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

23,102

 

 

 

808,599

 

 

2021

 

 

415,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

321,914

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

459,371

 

 

 

1,196,285

 

President and Chief

 

2017

 

 

372,269

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

243,656

 

 

 

223,963

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

15,782

 

 

 

855,670

 

 

2020

 

 

396,506

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

163,966

 

 

 

325,381

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

12,948

 

 

 

898,801

 

Administrative Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrence W. Kenny

 

2021

 

 

366,250

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

278,298

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

402,007

 

 

 

1,046,555

 

President of Air & Liquid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

Systems Corporation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The values set forth in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards of RSUs and PSUs pursuant to our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. With respect to awards made in 2018,2021, a portion of the PSUs (34%(up to 34% of the total target long-term incentive awards) becomes earned at the end of a three-year period, based on the percentage point improvement in the Corporation’s average ROIC from 20172021 to 2020,2023, and the remaining portion (33%(up to 33% of the total target long-term incentive awards) becomes earned based on our relative TSRrTSR over the three-year performance period. For awards made prior to 2018, a portionThe remaining 33% of PSUs (40% of the total target long-term incentive) becomes earned based on annually set EPS goals for each year in the three-year performance period and the remaining portion (30% of the total target long-term incentive awards) becomes earned based on our relative TSR overawards is attributable to RSUs. For the three-year performance period.  Because EPS goals were set separately every year, the amount in the table above based on the EPS performance reflects only the 2018 portion of the award, based on an assumed probably outcome of target performance.  Had the grant date fair value for this portion of PSUs been based on assumed maximum level of performance (i.e., at 150% of target), the grant date fair value for that portion of the PSUs would have been as follows: $182,389 for Mr. Stanik, $49,315 for Mr. McAuley, and $44,494 for Ms. Hoover. For the2021 ROIC portion of the PSUs, the grant date fair value was calculated based on an assumed probable outcome of target performance.  Had the grant date fair value for this portion of the PSUs been based on assumed maximum level of performance (i.e., at 200% of target), the 2021 grant date fair values for that portion of the PSUs in the table would have been the following: $205,700$637,507 for Mr. McBrayer; $142,800$228,486 for Ms. Hoover; and $176,126 for Mr. McAuley; and $187,000 for Ms. Hoover.Kenny. For the relative TSRrTSR portion of the PSUs, the grant date fair value was calculated using the Monte Carlo methodology. Had the grant date fair value for this portion of the PSUs been based on assumed maximum level of performance (i.e., at 200% of target), the grant date fair values for that portion of the PSUs in the table for 2021 would have been the following: $618,752 for Mr. McBrayer; $221,761 for Ms. Hoover, and $170,948 for Mr. Kenny. The amounts set forth for Ms. Hoover and Mr. Kenny in the column above reflect the acceleration of awards pursuant to their respective Retirement Agreements in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 1517 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. For additional information on the PSUs, see “Long-Term Incentive Awards” discussion under the Executive Compensation Overview.

For Mr. Stanik, the value of the stock award reflects the value of 4,697 RSUs granted to Mr. Stanik on May 5, 2016, the vesting of which was accelerated pursuant to the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between the Corporation and Mr. Stanik. The amount is based on the June 29, 2018 price of the Corporation’s common stock of $10.25.

 

 

(2)

Represents company contributions to the 401(k) Plan, club memberships, personal use of a company provided-vehicle,provided-automobile, reimbursement for tax preparation and financial consulting services, or tax gross-ups. Mr. McBrayer received a reimbursementand certain amounts paid pursuant to the Retirement Agreements. Included in “All Other Compensation” are the following amounts:

Name

Company Contribution to 401(k) Plan ($)

 

Amounts Pursuant to Retirement Agreement ($) (a)

 

Other ($)

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

19,950

 

 

 

 

 

7,632

 

Rose Hoover

 

 

 

 

451,400

 

 

8,331

 

Terrence W. Kenny

 

 

 

 

395,638

 

 

6,369

 

(a)

See “Retirement of Ms. Hoover” for the description of the expenses incurred in connection withamounts paid to Ms. Hoover pursuant to her retirement agreement. See “Retirement of Mr. Kenny” for the description of the amounts paid to Mr. Kenny pursuant to his relocation to Pittsburgh, PA, in the amount of $187,345, and a related tax gross-up in the amount of $51,960.  In accordance with the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between Mr. Stanik and the Corporation, Mr. Stanik is entitled to, among other things, COBRA premium and Medicare supplement reimbursement payments (see “Potential Payments upon Termination, Resignation or Change in Control”).     retirement agreement.

 

45



OUTSTANDING EQUITYEQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table summarizes certain information regarding outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end:

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

(a)

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

(e)

 

(f)

 

(g)

 

 

(h)

 

 

(i)

 

 

(j)

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

(e)

 

(f)

 

(g)

 

 

(h)

 

 

(i)

 

 

(j)

 

Name

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

 

Option

Exercise

Price($)

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

Number of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested(#)(1)

 

 

Market value

of shares or

units of stock

that have not

vested(#)(2)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested(#)(3)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested($)(4)

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

 

Option

Exercise

Price($)

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

Number of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested(#)(1)

 

 

Market value

of shares or

units of stock

that have not

vested($)(2)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested(#)(3)

 

 

Equity incentive plan awards: market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested($)(4)

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,884

 

 

 

67,840

 

 

 

12,257

 

 

 

37,997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,900

 

 

 

434,500

 

 

 

80,794

 

 

 

403,970

 

John S. Stanik

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,151

 

 

 

34,568

 

 

 

10,109

 

 

 

31,338

 

Rose Hoover

 

13,334

 

 

0

 

13.37/share

 

2/19/2019

 

 

14,757

 

 

 

45,747

 

 

 

13,358

 

 

 

41,410

 

Rose Hoover (5)

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.67/share

 

5/3/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.16/share

 

5/2/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

20.00/share

 

4/29/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrence W. Kenny (6)

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.67/share

 

5/3/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000

 

 

0

 

25.77/share

 

2/18/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.16/share

 

5/2/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

25.18/share

 

5/6/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

20.00/share

 

4/29/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.67/share

 

5/3/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

17.16/share

 

5/2/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

0

 

20.00/share

 

4/29/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate number of unvested RSUs granted on May 5, 2016,9, 2019, May 3, 2017,7, 2020 and May 9, 2018.13, 2021. These unvested RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning May 5, 2017,9, 2020, May 3, 2018,7, 2021 and May 9, 2019,13, 2022, respectively, as summarized below.

46


 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

# of Unvested Shares

 

 

Vesting Date

Rose HooverJ. Brett McBrayer

 

5/5/20169/2019

 

 

1,47210,372

 

 

5/5/20199/2022

 

 

5/3/20177/2020

 

 

1,96411,314

 

 

5/3/20197/2022

 

 

5/3/20177/2020

 

 

1,96511,315

 

 

5/3/20207/2023

 

 

5/9/201813/2021

 

 

3,11817,966

 

 

5/9/201913/2022

 

 

5/9/201813/2021

 

 

3,11917,966

 

 

5/9/202013/2023

 

 

5/9/201813/2021

 

 

3,11917,967

 

 

5/9/2021

Michael G. McAuley

5/5/2016

1,091

5/5/2019

5/3/2017

1,457

5/3/2019

5/3/2017

1,458

5/3/2020

5/9/2018

2,381

5/9/2019

5/9/2018

2,382

5/9/2020

5/9/2018

2,382

5/9/2021

J. Brett McBrayer

7/2/2018

6,000

7/2/2019

7/2/2018

6,000

7/2/2020

7/2/2018

3,294

7/2/2019

7/2/2018

3,295

7/2/2020

7/2/2018

3,295

7/2/202113/2024

 

(2)

The amounts shown in this column represent the market value of these stock awards based on a closing market price of $3.10$5.00 per share as of the close of trading on December 31, 20182020 (the last trading day of our fiscal year).


47


(3)

The amounts shown in this column include the relative TSR portion of the PSUs awarded in 2017 and the relative TSRrTSR and ROIC portions of the PSUs awarded in 20182020 and 2021 that remain subject to future performance. For purposes of determining the amounts shown in this column, we assumed achievement of threshold performance goals. The actual number may be more or less depending on the company’s performance during the applicable three-year performance period. If maximum level of performance is achieved, the number of shares that will vest will be 323,172 for Mr. McBrayer. All PSUs are scheduled to vest as summarized below:


 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

# of Unvested Shares

 

 

Vesting Date

 

Total(#)

Michael G. McAuley

5/3/2017

3,112

5/3/2020

5/9/2018

6,997

5/9/2021

10,109

Rose Hoover

5/3/2017

4,195

5/3/2020

5/9/2018

9,163

5/9/2021

13,358

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/7/2/20182020

 

 

12,25734,458

 

 

5/7/2/2023

5/13/2021

46,336

5/13/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,25780,794

 

 

For PSUs awarded in 2016,2019, the relative TSRrTSR performance of the Corporation for the 2016-20182019-2021 performance period was between target and maximum performance and thus an amount of shares between target and maximum were earned. The ROIC performance of the Corporation for the 2019-2021 performance period was below the threshold value, so no stock will be issued at vesting date (May 5, 2019)9, 2022) with respect to the 20162019 awards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, 88,252 shares of Common Stock subject to vesting subject to Ms. Hoover’s PSUs awarded in 2019 was accelerated upon her retirement.

(4)

The amounts shown in this column represent the value of the TSRrTSR and ROIC portion of the unvested PSUs based on the closing market price of our common stock ($3.10)Common Stock, or $5.00, as of the close of trading on December 31, 2018.2021. If maximum level of performance is achieved, the value of shares that will vest will be $1,615,860 for Mr. McBrayer.

(5)

Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, upon Ms. Hoover’s retirement she received accelerated vesting of 33,068 unvested shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding RSUs and accelerated vesting of 88,252 unvested shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding PSUs.

(6)

Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, upon Mr. Kenny’s retirement he received accelerated vesting of 9,953 unvested shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding RSUs and accelerated vesting of 13,400 unvested shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding PSUs.


48



RETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Corporation also maintains a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) that covers substantially all regular employees who were employed prior to June 30, 2015, the date on which benefit accruals under the Pension Plan were frozen. Due to Mr. Stanik’s retirement in 2018, he is not entitled to coverage under the Pension Plan since he did not meet the early retirement eligibility requirements. Ms. Hoover isand Mr. Kenny are entitled to coverage under the Pension Plan. None of the other named executive officers are covered under the Pension Plan since their employment with the Corporation began after June 30, 2015.  

TheAs noted above, the Corporation also maintains a SERP for certain of its current and former executives; that plan provides retirement benefits after completion of ten years of service and attainment of age 55. Ms. Hoover is the only named executive officer who is a participant in the SERP. The combined retirement benefit at age 65 or older provided by the Pension Plan and the SERP is 50% of the highest consecutive five-year average earnings in the final ten years of service. Earnings for this purpose generally include all cash compensation, including base salary and annual incentive awards, but excludes certain extra compensation such as compensation from the exercise of stock options. Participants are eligible for reduced benefits for early retirement at age 55. A benefit equal to 50% of the benefit otherwise payable at age 65 is paid to the surviving spouse of any participant who has had at least five years of service, commencing on the later of the month following the participant’s death or the month the participant would have reached age 55. In addition, there is an offset for pensions from other companies.


49



POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION,TERMINATION, RESIGNATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Executive Severance Plan

As previously mentioned, in 2018, the Corporation adopted the Executive Severance Plan for its key executive officers other than the CEO, to be in effect for a term of two years. Under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan, in the event of a termination by the Corporation without “cause” or by a participant for “good reason,” the participant, upon execution of a general release of liability against the Corporation and subject to compliance with applicable post-termination restrictive covenants and other obligations, will generally be eligible to receive:

an amount equal to the sum of his or her then-current annual base salary and the average annual cash incentive bonus paid to the participant for the three fiscal years immediately preceding the termination date; provided that (i) if the participant has been employed for fewer than three years, the average will be based on the applicable number of years (one or two), and (ii) if the termination occurs in the first year of employment, no bonus amount shall be included; and

payment by the Corporation of the participant’s COBRA premiums, less the amount that the participant would be required to contribute for such healthcare coverage if the participant were an active employee for a period ending upon the earlier of (x) 12 months and (y) the date on which the participant becomes entitled to comparable welfare benefits from another employer subject to the participant’s proper election to continue healthcare coverage under COBRA.

Mr. McBrayer is not a participant under the Executive Severance Plan.  However, his offer letter provides that, in the event of a termination of his employment other than (1) for “cause” or (2) for circumstances covered by the Change in Control Agreement, he will be eligible for severance pay in the amount equal to 18 months of base compensation if the termination occurs within the first 18 months of his start date (July 1, 2018) and 12 months of base compensation if the termination occurs after 18 months of the start date.

Change in Control Agreements and SERP

Each of the named executive officers (other than Mr. Stanik, who retired in 2018) is party to a change in control agreement with the Corporation.  Per the terms of change in control agreements, the named executive officer would be entitled to receive (i) three times the sum of annual salary and bonus paid for the prior year, (ii) continuation of employee benefits for two years (three years for Mr. McBrayer), (iii) cash payment in cancellation of outstanding stock options equal to the spread (if any) based on the greater of the stock price at termination and the price received in the change in control and the exercise price, (iv) accelerated vesting of unvested restricted stock units, and (v) the right to purchase the leased car used by the covered individual at the Corporation’s then book value (this feature is only applicable to Ms. Hoover)Hoover and Mr. Kenny).  

Ms. Hoover isand Mr. Kenny are the only executive officerofficers covered by the SERP.  Per the terms of the SERP, in the event a change in control occurs and, within 24 months after the change in control a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause or by the executive for good reason, Ms. Hoover’s and Mr. Kenny’s benefits under the plan would become vested and payable in a lump sum.  

The Corporation does not provide any tax gross-up payments under these agreements related to excise taxes under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G and 4999, or otherwise. Instead, the agreements provide for a cutback in benefits to avoid triggering such excise taxes, unless the named executive officer would receive a greater after-tax amount without such cutback.

A “change in control” occurs for purposes of the change in control agreements and the SERP:

If a person, other than persons currently in control, becomes an owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Corporation’s outstanding voting securities;

If for two consecutive years there ceases to be a majority on the Board of individuals who at the beginning of the period were Board members, other than a new director whose election was approved by a vote of 2/3 of directors then still in office who were directors at beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously approved;


If the shareholders approve a merger or consolidation in which the Corporation’s Common Stock is converted into shares of another corporation or cash or other property or the Corporation’s Common Stock is not converted but 40% of the surviving corporation in the merger is owned by shareholders other than those who owned the Corporation’s Common Stock prior to merger;

If the shareholders approve a merger or consolidation in which the Corporation’s common stock is converted into shares of another corporation or cash or other property or the Corporation’s common stock is not converted but 40% of the surviving corporation in the merger is owned by shareholders other than those who owned the Corporation’s common stock prior to merger;

If there occurs any transaction which results in the Corporation’s common stockCommon Stock no longer being publicly traded; or

If the shareholders of the Corporation approve a plan of complete liquidation or agreement for sale or disposition of substantially all assets followed by distribution of proceeds to shareholders.

A termination for “cause” occurs in each of the following cases:

willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties (other than due to disability) consistent with the named executive officer’s position with the Corporation (subject to notice and cure provisions);

willful engagement in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the Corporation; or

the named executive officer’s conviction of a felony, or conviction of a misdemeanor involving assets of the Corporation.

A named executive officer may claim “good reason” for termination in the following events, subject to certain notice requirements and an opportunity for the Corporation to cure:

a reduction in scope of duties and authority or adverse change in reporting relationship;

a reduction in base salary or bonus (unless similar reductions in bonuses are made for all executives);

relocation of the executive by the Corporation greater than 25 miles;

50


the failure by the Corporation to continue in effect any of the Corporation’s employee benefit plans, policies, practices in which the named executive officer participated before the change in control; or

failure to cause the change in control agreement to be assumed by the Corporation’s successor.

2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Under the terms of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the 2016, 2017 and 2018through 2020 RSUs and PSUs include special vesting provisions in case of termination of employment due to a change in control. In that case, RSUs become fully vested and PSUs become vested as follows: (A) for the TSRrTSR and ROIC portions of the PSUs, a prorated number of the PSUs will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of such termination assuming target performance and based on the portion of the performance period completed through the date of such termination; (B) for any performance-adjusted PSUs related to the EPS portion for any previously completed year in the performance period, such performance-adjusted PSUs will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of such termination; and (C) for the one-third portion of the EPS portion being earned for the year of such termination, a prorated number of such PSUs shall become immediately earned and vested as of the date of such termination assuming target performance and based on the portion of the applicable year completed through the date of such termination.

Under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, a “change in control” occurs:

If a person, other than persons currently in control, becomes an owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Corporation’s outstanding voting securities;

If any election has occurred of persons to the Board that causes fewer than two-thirds of the Board to consist of persons other than (i) persons who were members of the Board on the effective date of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan and (ii) persons who were nominated for elections as members of the Board at a time when two-thirds of the Board consisted of persons who were members of the Board on that effective date;

Upon consummation (i.e., closing) of a reorganization, merger or consolidation involving the Corporation, unless, following such reorganization, merger or consolidation, the owners of the Corporation before the transaction own more than 75% of the resulting entity;


Upon consummation (i.e., closing) of a sale of substantially all of the Corporation’s assets, unless the owners of the Corporation before the transaction own more than 75% of the purchaser; or

Upon consummation (i.e. closing) of a sale of substantially all of the Corporation’s assets, unless the owners of the Corporation before the transaction own more than 75% of the purchaser; or

If there is a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Corporation.

Retirement and Consulting AgreementREPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Mr. Stanik retired as the CEO of the Corporation effective as of June 30, 2018.  PursuantNotwithstanding anything to the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between the Corporation and Mr. Stanik, dated as of June 30, 2018,contrary set forth in exchange for Mr. Stanik executing a general release of claims against the Corporation, Mr. Stanik has received or is entitled to receive, as applicable, the following compensation: (i) accelerated vesting of 4,697 RSUs granted to Mr. Stanik on May 5, 2016, (ii) reimbursement of (A) COBRA premiums for Mr. Stanik through October 2018 and for his spouse through December 31, 2019, and (B) Medicare supplement for Mr. Stanik through December 31, 2019, and (iii) payment of a pro rata portion of Mr. Stanik’s short-term incentive award for the 2018 fiscal year, in the amount of $72,587, which is to be paid in shares of common stock of the Corporation, rather than cash, based on the closing priceany of the Corporation’s common stockfilings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that incorporate other Corporation filings, including this Proxy Statement, the following Report of the Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on March 15, 2019.this review and discussion, it has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Elizabeth A. Fessenden (Chair)

William K. Lieberman

Stephen E. Paul

51


 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The Corporation’s policies and procedures for reviewing, approving and ratifying transactions with related persons are set forth in the Corporation’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com. Under these policies and procedures, the Corporation’s management is responsible for determining whether a particular transaction should be referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration. The Nominating and Governance Committee then determines whether to approve, ratify, revise the terms of, reject the transaction or refer the transaction to the full Board or another appropriate committee of the Board for approval or ratification. The policy and procedures apply to transactions involving an amount in excess of $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest. There were no such transactions since January 1, 2020. The policy and procedures generally do not apply to employment matters (except employment of an executive officer who is an immediate family member of another executive officer), director compensation, commercial transactions in the ordinary course of business under ordinary business terms, charitable contributions, transactions such as payment of dividends where all shareholders receive the same proportional benefits and transactions involving competitive bids.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, with management and discussed those matters required to be discussed under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards with Deloitte & ToucheBDO USA, LLP (“Deloitte”BDO”).

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from DeloitteBDO required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’sBDO’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed with DeloitteBDO its independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to in the preceding paragraphs, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with the SEC.

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to the Corporation by Deloitte:BDO in 2020 and 2021:

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Audit fees (a)

 

$

1,656,185

 

 

$

1,343,263

 

 

$

546,612

 

 

$

589,488

 

Audit-related fees (b)

 

$

2,028

 

 

$

2,695

 

 

 

8,144

 

 

 

50,000

 

Tax fees (c)

 

$

1,964

 

 

$

177,642

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All other fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

1,660,177

 

 

$

1,523,600

 

 

$

554,756

 

 

$

639,488

 

 

(a)

Fees for audit services primarily related to the audit of (1) the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting and (2) statutory filingsfinancial statements for the Corporation’s foreign subsidiaries.

(b)

Fees for audit-related services primarily related to the subscription feeattest services not required by statute or regulation for Deloitte’s research guidance.

(c)

Fees2021 and accounting consultations and internal control review for tax services in 2018 related to general tax consultation whereas fees in 2017 were primarily related to tax advice provided in tax restructuring transactions and transfer pricing studies.2020.

In considering the nature of the services provided by Deloitte,our independent auditors, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with Deloitteour independent auditors and the Corporation’s management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC. All services provided by Deloitteour independent auditors and reflected in the table above were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the policy described below.

52


The Audit Committee has adopted a Policy for Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services (the “Policy”) provided by the Corporation’s independent auditor. According to the Policy, the Corporation’s independent auditor may not provide the following services to the Corporation:

maintain or prepare the Corporation’s accounting records or prepare the Corporation’s financial statements that are either filed with the SEC or form the basis of financial statements filed with the SEC;

provide appraisal or valuation services when it is reasonably likely that the results of any valuation or appraisal would be material to the Corporation’s financial statements or where the independent auditor would audit the results;

provide certain management or human resource functions;

serve as a broker-dealer, promoter or underwriter of the Corporation’s securities;

provide any service in which the person providing the service must be admitted to practice before the courts of a U.S. jurisdiction;

provide any internal audit services relating to accounting controls, financial systems, or financial statements; or

design or implement a hardware or software system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements or generates information that is significant to the Corporation’s financial statements, taken as a whole.

In addition, in connection with its adoption of the Policy, the Audit Committee pre-approved certain audit-related and other non-prohibited services. Any services not prohibited or pre-approved by the Policy must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Policy. The Policy is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (Chairman)(Chair)

Michael I. German

William K. Lieberman

Ernest G. SiddonsTerry L. Dunlap

 


53


RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHEBDO USA, LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 20192022
(Proposal 4)3)

The Audit Committee, comprised of independent members of the Board of Directors, has appointed Deloitte & ToucheBDO USA, LLP (“Deloitte”BDO”) as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.2020. Shareholder ratification of the selection of DeloitteBDO as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required by the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation or Amended and Restated By-laws. The Corporation is submitting the selection of DeloitteBDO to the shareholders for ratification because the Board of Directors considers it to be the best practice in corporate governance to do so. Even if the shareholders ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of independent accountants, the Audit Committee in its discretion may change the appointment at any time if it determines that such change would be in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte,BDO, the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee, but DeloitteBDO may still be retained.

Representatives of DeloitteBDO, independent public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, are expected to be in attendance at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so and will respond to appropriate questions.

Recent Change in Auditor

As reported on our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2020 (the “Change in Auditor Form 8-K”), on March 4, 2020, the Audit Committee of the Corporation approved the dismissal of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”) as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm, effective as of the date of D&T’s completion of its audit services for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, and the filing of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Since 1999, D&T had audited our consolidated financial statements, including our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018, and 2017, and our related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). The audit reports of D&T on our consolidated financial statements for the periods stated above did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, and the subsequent interim period through March 4, 2020, there were (1) no disagreements with D&T on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of D&T, would have caused D&T to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports, and (2) no events of the type listed in paragraphs (A) through (D) of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

We furnished D&T with a copy of the disclosure on March 4, 2020, providing D&T with the opportunity to furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the statements made by us herein in response to Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K and, if not, stating the respect in which it does not agree. A copy of D&T’s letter to the SEC was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Change in Auditor Form 8-K.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and during the subsequent interim period through March 10, 2020, we did not consult BDO regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” with its former accountants or a “reportable event” as those terms are defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE DELOITTEBDO RATIFICATION PROPOSAL.

54


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2018,2021 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance:

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be

issued upon exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights(1)

 

 

Weighted-average exercise

price of outstanding options,

warrants and rights(2)

 

 

Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under equity

compensation plans

(excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 

 

Number of securities to be

issued upon exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights(1)

 

 

Weighted-average exercise

price of outstanding options,

warrants and rights(2)

 

 

Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under equity

compensation plans

(excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 

Equity compensation plans

approved by security holders

 

 

904,877

 

 

$

20.54

 

 

 

740,187

 

 

 

838,954

 

 

$

18.32

 

 

 

1,266,215

 

Equity compensation plans not

approved by security holders

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Total

 

 

904,877

 

 

$

20.54

 

 

 

740,187

 

 

 

838,954

 

 

$

18.32

 

 

 

1,266,215

 

(1)

Includes 299,292633,454 unvested RSUs and PSUs (assuming target performance) issued under the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

(2)

Does not reflect RSUs or PSUs included in the first column, which do not have an exercise price.

55


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20202023

Any shareholder who wishes to place a proposal before the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit the proposal to the Corporation’s Secretary, at its executive offices, not later than November 28, 201925, 2022 to have it considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting in 2020.2023.

If a shareholder otherwise wishes to propose proper business from the floor for consideration at the 20202023 Annual Meeting, the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (available on the Corporation’s website at


www.ampcopgh.com) www.ampcopittsburgh.com) provide that (i) the shareholder must notify the Corporation’s Secretary in writing, (ii) the shareholder’s notice must be received at the Corporation’s executive offices not earlier than January 9, 20205, 2023 and not later than February 8, 20204, 2023 and (iii) the shareholder’s notice must contain the specific information set forth in the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. These requirements apply only to matters to be brought before the 20202023 Annual Meeting which have not been submitted for possible inclusion in the Corporation’s 20202023 proxy materials.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as brokers and banks) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies.

A number of banks, trustees and other holders of record who are our shareholders may be “householding” our proxy materials and annual reports for their customers. This means that only one copy of our proxy materials may have been sent to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from one or more of the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If you prefer to receive separate copies of a proxy materials or annual report, either now or in the future, please call us at 412-456-4400, or send your request in writing to the following address: Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation c/o Corporate Secretary at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106. If you are still receiving multiple reports and proxy statements for shareholders who share an address and would prefer to receive a single copy of the annual report and proxy statement in the future, please contact us at the above address or telephone number. If you are a beneficial owner, you should contact your bank, broker or other holder of record.

REFERENCES TO OUR WEBSITE ADDRESS

References to our website address throughout this Proxy Statement and the accompanying materials are for informational purposes only, or to fulfill specific disclosure requirements of the SEC’s rules or the rules of NYSE. These references are not intended to, and do not, incorporate the contents of our website by reference into this Proxy Statement or the accompanying materials.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The “Audit Committee Report” is not deemed to be filed with the SEC and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any prior or future filings made by the Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Corporation specifically incorporates such information by reference.

56


OTHER MATTERSMATTERS

The Board of Directors does not know of any other business that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. Should any other matter come before the meeting,meeting; however, action may be taken thereon pursuant to proxies in the form enclosed unless discretionary authority is withheld.

 


ANNEX A

AMENDMENT OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

The undersigned business corporation does hereby certify that:

FIRST The name of the corporation is Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, and the Corporation’s registered office is c/o Corporation Service Company, Dauphin County:

SECOND, the Corporation was incorporated under the Act of April 29, 1874, as amended, and its date of incorporation was January 30, 1929; letters patent were issued March 19, 1929.

THIRD:That the amendment shall be effective upon filing these Articles of Amendment.

FOURTH:The amendment was duly adopted by the Corporation’s shareholders in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 1914 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law at the Corporation’s annual meeting held on [____], 2019.

FIFTH:The amendment adopted by the Corporation is set forth in full below:

The first paragraph of Article FIFTH of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

“FIFTH: The authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall be 3,000,000 shares of Preference Stock, without par value, and 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the par value of $1.00 per share.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officer on [____], 2019.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

By:

Maria Trainor

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretarymportant Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 9, 2018: The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 10-K Wrap of the Corporation are available at http://www.Ampcopittsburgh.com/investors; and The Notice and Proxy Statement and 10-K Wrap are also available at www.proxyvote.com. E37368-P03581 AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 9, 2018 10:00 A.M. The undersigned hereby appoints Maria Trainor and Michael G. McAuley and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution to vote, as specified on the reverse side, the shares of stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, to be held at The Duquesne Club, in the Adams Room, 4th Floor, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, on Wednesday, May 9, 2018, at 10:00 A.M., and any adjournments thereof. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED: FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 (OR, IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, THE SHARES MAY BE VOTED CUMULATIVELY); FOR PROPOSAL 2; AND FOR PROPOSAL 3. THE PROXIES NAMED ABOVE ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE and mail in the enclosed, postage prepaid envelope. CUMULATE (If you noted cumulative voting instructions above, please check the corresponding box on the reverse side.)

57


 

 

WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING; BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. IF YOU CHOOSE TO CUMULATE VOTES FOR DIRECTORS YOU MUST VOTE BY MAIL. VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION C/O BROADRIDGE P.O. BOX 1342 BRENTWOOD, NY 11717 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E64617-P18477 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLYAMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. Vote on Directors 1. Election of Directors ! ! ! Nominees: 01) Elizabeth A. Fessenden 02) Terry L. Dunlap For Against Abstain Vote on Proposals ! ! ! 2. To approve an amendment to the Corporation's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation's common stock from 20,000,000 to 40,000,000 shares. ! ! ! 3. To approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of the named executive officers. ! ! ! 4. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1; AND A VOTE "FOR" ITEM 2, ITEM 3 AND ITEM 4. All proxies heretofore given or executed with respect to the shares of stock represented by this proxy are by the filing of this proxy, expressly revoked. To cumulate votes as to a particular nominee as explained in the Proxy Statement, check box to the right, multiply the number of shares held by you by two and vote the result for the nominees listed in any proportion, then indicate the name(s) and the number of votes to be given to such nominee(s) on the reverse side of this card. Please do not check box unless you want to exercise cumulative voting. ! NOTE: Signature should conform exactly to name as stenciled hereon. Executors, administrators, guardians, trustees, attorneys and officers signing for a corporation should give full title. For joint accounts each owner must sign. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date58


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 9, 2019: The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 10-K Wrap of the Corporation are available at http://www.Ampcopittsburgh.com/investors; and The Notice and Proxy Statement and 10-K Wrap are also available at www.proxyvote.com. E64618-P18477 AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 9, 2019 10:00 A.M.  The undersigned hereby appoints Maria Trainor and Michael G. McAuley and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution to vote, as specified on the reverse side, the shares of stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, to be held at The Duquesne Club, in the Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, on Thursday, May 9, 2019, at 10:00 A.M., and any adjournments thereof. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED: FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 (OR, IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, THE SHARES MAY BE VOTED CUMULATIVELY); FOR PROPOSAL 2; FOR PROPOSAL 3; AND FOR PROPOSAL 4. THE PROXIES NAMED ABOVE ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE and mail in the enclosed, postage prepaid envelope. CUMULATE (If you noted cumulative voting instructions above, please check the corresponding box on the reverse side.)